*claimed he wasAnd I'm definitely not taking his word for it, surely blood/hair tests will tell the real story.
Sure. Then imho if he can't say it definitively, he should not make the first claim (slipping in weasel words like 'could' and 'up to' serve as a lazy catch-all disclaimer in that case.)
"What we found is that consuming high amounts of ultra-processed foods could increase your risk of developing depression by up to 50%"and "He said that ... they cannot say highly processed food causes depression"Those statements sound contradictory (Or do they mean that it 'could' be 50% or 0%? But if so, why say anything at all)
U.S. is sending a carrier strike group closer to Israel and will begin supplying munitions starting today
... they can get by without US supportIsrael already receiving US support since 1973. So that ship has sailed, so to speak.
I collect faecal specimens.