just_another_person @ just_another_person @lemmy.world

Posts

524

Comments

7,255

Joined

2 yr. ago

Plug it into a machine, mount the drive, then copy the data off of it. You can get an external USB drive adapter for cheap if needed.

Uhhhhhhhh, okay, so what? Did you read this article?

Sorry that ONLY HALF of my mentions of fact meet your very strict criteria.

Oh no

🙄 good Lord...no.

I beg to differ.

Putin has been throwing people out of balconies and windows for a few decades.

Hitler murdered millions.

Mussolini had his own populace murdered based on their politics.

Saddam Hussein murdered thousands, along with Gaddafi.

China is doing this right now with tens of thousands.

Israel is as well.

I can go on and on. This is dumb fucking writing that is trying to ignore history and recent events. GTFO with this bullshit.

It's not that shocking when it's been being mentioned for the same reason since the actual election.

Well, it's funny, because that's not how non-profit organizations work...you fucking idiots.

Jesus Christ 🙄

Not only is this a stupid take on literally everything it contains, then it goes and puts everything in a conspiratorial framework?

Did Tim Pool write this dumb shit?

Electile Dysfunction

👍

Don't post dumbass AI takes for duck's sake. This is insane.

How does that relate to this post about public lands being sold?

What?

Again, and as I said before, it does not do that, because that wasn't the case being argued. It affects this one scope.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/supreme-court-sides-with-trump-administration-on-nationwide-injunctions-in-birthright-citizenship-case/

You can go and find the ruling text and the dissent text. The reason why the news outlets are reporting other headlines is because this weakens the ability of lower courts to do nationwide injunctions without a specific scope. There is no specific text in the ruling that "bans" nationwide injunctions by lower courts.

By the way, the scope of this is important, but they of course had no ruling on the 14th amendment, because they fucking can't. It's the constitution.

Literally anyone can walk into court and say "Unconstitutional" and have this entire order upended, because the Supreme Court has to take other rulings into account.

Let me go one step further by saying this was on the Shadow Docket, and these are temporary stays of other rulings. This is not codified as law, or anything of the sort. Whatever damage they've done here can easily be reversed without the court's involvement.

OH NOOOOOOOOOOO

Ugh.

Pelosi needs to go, but this guy...ugh.

It's about this specific junction. Not all.

Supreme Court opinions are only scoped to the argument brought to the court. This one was about many states using over the Birthright Citizenship.

They did not make any sort of ruling about ALL federal court injunctions. That would cripple their own court and the federal court system with immediate filings.

It's not bulletproof, but I've seen it live, so it happens. Proof:

https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/monitor-shows-artifacts-for-a-couple-minutes-then-works-perfectly-fine.3518801/

When you increase your resolution, your monitor switches power modes. At a higher refresh rate, a dirty power signal can cause artifacts on the screen. Usually this means that you'd see bit crawl on the edges of the screen, but it could show display artifacts like you describe depending on the panel controller.

If your UPS took a hit during a thunderstorm, you could easily have a damaged rectifier in the UPS. That rectifier is responsible for smoothing the power signal coming out the ports on your UPS. A dirty signal can do the above as I mentioned.

You wouldn't notice a problem on your machine because it's own PSU smooths those signals out, but a monitor doesn't have that.

I meant switch the power plug for the monitor to a different outlet.

The ruling only applies to the nationwide injunction that was issued on this order. As I said in my other comment, any individuals can sign onto this simply by asking. There will be a massive flood of options to do this showing up in Monday, I guarantee, so I'm not worried about that.

It wasn't a ruling on nationwide injunctions in general, it wasn't a legal ruling saying that federal judges cannot do this in the future, and it wasn't an exclusion of anybody from signing on to this.

As far as the next few years...honestly, we just need to make it to midterms. That's what I'm focused on and worried about. The GOP is already eating themselves alive and fracturing in a million pieces just like his first term, and at record speed. Yeah, shit feels kind of bleak, but people need to think more strategically and manage out how we GET to the midterms without shit getting worse or escalating. That's the important bit.

Edit: here's a very smart and measured legal analyst that spells it out succinctly: https://www.rawstory.com/msnbc-2672488166/