That's not AI works. It's exactly as biased as the humans who produced the content on which it is trained.
That said, I also don't believe these models have been trained exclusively on white straight men's conversations, that would take some effort to achieve.
More likely, it's been trained on internet forums, so similar to what it's being asked to moderate. And as long as there's a human at the other end of an appeal, it should be fine.
Yeah, with sound on the story is quite different. I had it muted last night.
That said, the value of any photographic or video evidence has gone down for a long time, especially now with AI. Even without that, tampering with a video's sound has always been trivial.
So I'm generally skeptical of any such evidence, no matter which side it comes from. Moreso when we're talking about war, where truth is the first casualty and manipulating the public opinion is very much part of any strategy.
It's unfortunate, because real people are suffering and I'm here sitting comfortably and raising an eyebrow because I can't trust the reports about it.
In other words, Israel’s Final Solution to the Gaza Palestinian Question is ethnic cleansing.
The situation is horrible no matter from which side you look at it, especially for the Palestine civilian population, but I wouldn't go as far as characterizing this as ethnic cleansing or final solution. Hamas is not an ethnicity, Gaza is not Auschwitz. By bringing up such extreme comparisons you lose credibility.
You mean like what Trump supporters consume? And Fox, MSNBC, and all the other "news" outlets? How is that freedom working for the people in the land of the free?
There may be differences in the scale of bias and propaganda, but nobody should live under the illusion that they have access to unbiased news.
I'm always baffled by the prevalent idea that the Russian population is influenced by propaganda while in the west we aren't. Truth is the first casualty of war, for all sides.
The same absurd thinking can be seen in political discussion. Each side is convinced the other side is deluded and lives in a bubble of fake news. Like their side isn't.
Exactly. And the article's title is doubly disingenuous: "baby boomers may be to blame" ... because their partners are dying. Right. It's their fault, damn it! And there's too many of them!
Interesting, I didn't know that! That usage of lora was completely lost. Being an old guy, I sometimes wonder when I'm writing some slang if the younglings will understand it. Although lunfardo should stay pretty stable as a kind of side-language, no?
That's not AI works. It's exactly as biased as the humans who produced the content on which it is trained.
That said, I also don't believe these models have been trained exclusively on white straight men's conversations, that would take some effort to achieve.
More likely, it's been trained on internet forums, so similar to what it's being asked to moderate. And as long as there's a human at the other end of an appeal, it should be fine.