Yeah, fair enough, I do agree that this is largely driven by capitalism, and if we didn't have a capitalist society we would hopefully be going about this more cautiously. Still, I feel like it's a unique enough situation that I would consider it its own x-risk.
That makes sense, and "just" is a filler word in English. I can see why in another language like German this would work fine. But in English, at least to me, this seems exceptionally clunky. The simplest explanation is simply that "just" isn't generally used in a context where "what" is been elided, but maybe there's a deeper reason why it sounds odd to me.
you've omitted "just." If "just" were not in the sentence I would have instinctively filled it in with the missing words you've suggested. But I can't reconcile "just" with any parse.
Ok, so to be clear, you're saying that AI x-risk is already partially or even mostly bundled under "We end stratified society and power disparity, or we die."?
Not to mention skynet. It always bothers me when people leave AI out of lists of x-risks. I guess it's because a popular sci-fi movie predicted it would happen, so nobody takes it seriously. Or perhaps it's just because AI is so unpopular now, nobody wants to devote any time to thinking about the ramifications of it becoming smarter.
I wrote a script called please. You input please followed by any other command (e.g. please git clone, please wget blahblah) and a robotic voice will say "affirmative," then the command will run, and when it completes, the robotic voice reads out the exit code (e.g. "completed successfully" or "failed with status 1" etc.)
This is useful for when you have a command that takes a long time and you want to be alerted when it's finished. And it's a gentleman.
Sounds like it's saying "or maybe this isn't real equality?", which is very counter to what I assume is its intended message, an attempt to convince the reader that equality isn't the epitome of human fairness.
I'm responding to the claim that everyone on the progress flag is already included on the pride flag. I am not expressing an opinion about whether a flag should or should not represent whatever group of people. Am I wrong that the person I am responding to implied that this?
the word "kill" is typically used in regards to warfare, not murder, so I'm not sure why you would say in this instance that it was written as though it wasn't an act of war.
Even if that were what he's doing, I would still avoid using it as I'm a supporter of the public domain on principle. If something is essentially public domain, it should be fully public domain.
Yeah, fair enough, I do agree that this is largely driven by capitalism, and if we didn't have a capitalist society we would hopefully be going about this more cautiously. Still, I feel like it's a unique enough situation that I would consider it its own x-risk.