Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
3
Comments
389
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Right. The problem with SO is that you don't actually get to ask any questions; so reason would suggest anything is at least as good as SO-- even asking a house plant, or Siri, or whatever. Something that actually answers your question would obviously be a better option.

    Stack Overflow brought their irrelevance on themselves, I suspect.

  • It is my experience that school administrators can be quite illogical.

    This is the part of your comment I should have quoted, sorry. This gives the impression that school administrators are somehow set apart from the general population's propensity to being illogical.

  • The only better occupation to learn to be a good fascist than the military is the police.

    Is that what you think this quoted sentence means?

  • Legal ramifications in what way? And do we know that there was a dialog about this with the community mods? The one I looked at has rules against directly linking to infringing content, so it seem-- at least from where I'm sitting-- that blocking would not be an appropriate first step, instead opening a dialog with the mods/admins to moderate any offending content.

    And, in case it needs saying-- US copyright law is not global copyright law, and discussing copyright infringement is not illegal.

    Though, more to the point, this kind of poor communication-- if not the actions themselves-- makes me wonder if I should move to a new instance. I don't want to, but I also don't want admins making decisions without communicating them to the userbase, whether I personally agree with the decision or not. It certainly doesn't give the impression of transparency.

  • You seem to be under the impression that school administration are an exception and not the rule.

    They will fight you to get you to conform.

    Stripping out the somewhat bizarre manipulative language, yes, of course any organization is going to want you to use their systems to streamline their processes; it's far more efficient to have everyone using the same the system than for it to be a hodgepodge of different methods to achieve the same goal. Does that really strike you as odd?

  • You didn't add anything new to the discussion. I understand that sometimes bureaucracies-- like the public school system-- can implement poorly thought out policies, but again, I assure you that there will be a way to pick up that hypothetical kid without an app or smart phone. Because, again, the alternative is that the kid doesn't get picked up and... what? Stays at the school?

    There will be a backup method. The guy I initially responded to probably just did like most of us would do and installed the app without question.

  • That's not a change in cancellation policy; that's a change in package pricing and availability.

  • There are reasons besides "being poor" for not have smart phone access at pickup time. I assure you the answer won't be "I guess this kid is spending the night here".

    There is a backup method.

    Edit: minor rewording for clarity.

  • I literally cannot retrieve my child from school without a smartphone.

    I'm positive there is a backup method; did you ask about one, or did you simply install the app?

  • A caveat: This user analysis involved just 12 programmers being asked to assess if they prefer the responses of ChatGPT or those written by humans on Stack Overflow to 2,000 randomly sampled questions.

    Nothing to see here.

  • I do wonder though if we’ll see changes made to the cancellation policies. I’ve certainly been expecting a change there for years.

    What kind of changes to the cancellation policies are you imagining?

  • This kind of defeats the purpose of federation, no? The point is, I thought, that it didn't really matter which instance you joined.

  • There's no excuse for keeping excessively violent and racist cops on the force.

    I read somewhere a couple of years back that a big roadblock to the concept of "police reform" is that many (all?) police unions have language that requires officers with less seniority to be laid off before officers with more seniority. This means that if the culture is being cultivated from the old guard, and it always is, that the only way to really root it out is to completely disband the department and then start it again with all new people.

    This isn't meant to be an excuse, but to explain why it's so difficult; almost to the point where the phrase "police reform" is a nonsensical statement. It's less "reform" and more scrap it all and start over.

  • Connect has this option like 3/4 the way down the settings, called (Experimental) Horizontal swipe for next post. Seems default off.

  • Please, please don't take this as any insult or criticism, but for future reference, it's "piqued".

    This particular homophone is almost as devious as "milquetoast". (Sounds like "milk toast")

    Edit: someone beat me to it and now I feel like a jerk for piling on. Sorry!

  • Because it's not worth the resources to worry about. The GOP is just doing it because they don't actually know how to govern; they need something they can point to that looks like they're actually doing something, and they know it spins up their low education voters.

  • This isn't strictly true, but even if it were, do you see anyone on the democratic side opening investigations into the Trump kids doing this?