jjjalljs @ jjjalljs @ttrpg.network

Posts

1

Comments

2,750

Joined

2 yr. ago

For some reason getting a passport is like $200, plus whatever it takes to get the required supporting documents (eg: birth certificate, the photo). That's not much by many metrics, but a lot of people in the US just don't have $200 to spend.

No one's going to rally around creepy Mike Johnson's corpse. No one cares about the guy Luigi (allegedly) shot.

The right would immediately use that to disenfranchise blacks, queers, and women. "You need a degree from an accredited college to vote, and coincidentally women only schools don't count, nor do historically black ones"

We can't just kill all the conservatives but if you could somehow prevent them from accessing power, we'd be better off.

Fine needs to be much bigger. All the decision makers that approved it need to be removed and barred from working in the industry

Technically correct, the best kind of correct

That's such a non sequitur I don't even know what you're trying to communicate

Sometimes I wonder about if the US had stayed a colony longer. Slavery probably would have ended sooner. Probably have a better government structure.

If calculators routinely gave the wrong answer this would be more compelling.

Nitpick: It's probably not the devs so much as the capitalist owners and management collaborators. I'd guess most of the people making the games would be happy to have someone play their game at all. It's not like they typically get a cut of the profits (again: capitalism)

It's another manifestation of separate rules for the rich and everyone else.

I've been happy with Bandcamp, though they got sold so they're no longer independent.

But the model is you can stream for free however many times the artist has it set to, and then you're expected to buy it. Once you buy it, its yours DRM-free forever.

So if you buy an album or two a month, it costs similar to a subscription but you build up a library. After a while, you might find there are months you don't buy anything, but just listen to what you already bought.

And agian, what are government moderators?

Oh, sorry. I meant the moderators of lemmy.world. If you say anything too spicy, your comment gets removed

I meant more generally, so democrats can win elections and then win votes. It's something they should have been doing for the past decade. Look at how the democratic party is treating Zohran for an example of how not to do it.

In my imagination there are increasingly desperate actions they could do to stop the bill from proceeding. Pull the fire alarm. Start a fire. Cover all the chairs with honey. I don't know. I feel like if it looked like a portal to hell was about to open I would break a lot of norms and rules to stop it

You said that most laws require intent.

I said that strict liability exists. This was admittedly, a nitpick.

You did an on sequitur about how the US has a police problem, and said "These aren’t normal laws in other countries fyi.". I took that to imply the concept of strict liability doesn't exist in other laws, but maybe you meant something else. Maybe you meant it's not common?

I then pointed out that the concept originated in Britain. You said "If it originated there, why doesn’t Canada have it lmfao.", which is factually incorrect as far as I can tell. Canada has a concept of strict liability.

You then said,

Not for sex offenders like pissing in public, of course it exists in other areas of law, but those aren’t applicable to all other areas.

Ignoring what feels like a moving goal post, maybe this reveals where we diverged. Maybe you thought I was saying all laws are strict liability? I wasn't.

The most famous example of strict liability is statutory rape. This is off topic from guys pissing in a parking lot (though I wouldn't be surprised if ICE goons do other crimes). https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/statutory-rape.html

As most statutory rape laws appear as "strict liability" offenses, this limits the amount of legal defenses available to someone accused.

The link I provided was a wikipedia article is clearly not an exhaustive answer of all things on the topic. If you do click through to the criminal article, it does mention a case. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability_(criminal)

Anyway, this is a pointless, unpleasant, argument.

I'm not even sure what you're arguing anymore. My point was strict liability exists. Also the most famous instance of strict liability is sex crimes, I'm told.

A 30 second search revealed that Canada has some strict liability laws.

The idea originated in Britain, per Wikipedia. This isn't a uniquely American problem

You can make an argument that we shouldn't have inherited Britain's legal system, but that's a pretty big argument

I've looked online but I guess I failed my search checks, because I didn't find anything big in NYC.

But also like others have said, we need to do more than just march. We need to be disruptive. No more labor until every Republican resigns. That kind of thing.

I think that's the "only Democrats have agency" thing that comes up. When Republicans are horrible shits people are just like yeah they're horrible but like you don't blame the bear for doing bear stuff. But everyone else is held to normal human standards