Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JE
Posts
13
Comments
343
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Without thinking about it much, my understanding was that each line of the stack trace referred to a real line, even though the block as a whole wasn't a program.

    But! because of this comment I went and checked the lines of those stack traces. And in fact, they're not real lines, just the C++ type expansion.

    That said I've got a another half as bad example that is real so Ive edited the comment to point to that example instead.

  • Not even just trolls, I have yet to come across a clearly-bad post that wasn't already downvoted to oblivion, or a clearly-good post that had a negative total. And the csam response? Straight up world-class defense system faster than any megacorp could've scrambled together.

    Lemmy users are anything but passive when it comes to trash showing up in the feed.

  • The downvotes are because of the title and the example (cause yeah; just tell her "no"). I had to read the post three times to find them, but there are good points in there. I feel bad for you.

    Social health is important, and if you think something is wrong, then something is wrong. Absolutely don't waste the prime of your life being alone Look at your city events, find clubs, get a dog and meet people at the dog park, volunteer, go to the gym, go to a skate park.

    But

     
            social life ≠ social media*
    
    
      

    The caveat* is group chats. Being excluded from a basketball pickup-games chat because of privacy has no easy answer: either compromise on privacy to improve social health, or be alone. That is something that's not brought up in privacy communities, and I think it's wise of you to see that problem and not be afraid to bring it up.

    For the rest of the social media though, that's absolutely not the case. It's well documented social media always caused poor mental health, the companies know it's bad, and they spend billions trying to cover it up.

    So if you change your stance on social media, just remember: Followers and internet points are a horrible substitute for friendship.

  • Eh I don't really buy the noticeable argument. Either it's not noticeable both ways (doesn't matter that m is squished all the time) or it's not noticeable both ways (expanding m doesn't align and it's noticeable and annoying).

    Optical Illusion

    Wait no, its the fault of the stretching! I mean yes, the i's are the same hight (which is shocking, thank you for correcting us on that) but the reason it's an optical illusion is because the i on the left is wider and wide m exaggerates the thinness of the i on the right! Turn off the stretching and suddenly the i's look the same height.

    Edit: I see someone else already pointed this out

    This is what I meant by "feeling like my editor is gaslighting me"

  • thanks for rendering that! and yeah that height difference is really weird. That almost seems like a bug.

    Also Idk if the ='s make the m smaller or bigger.

    If the streching is so small as to be unnoticable (and I agree it's pretty subtle) then I also don't really understand the benefit.

  • I feel like its weird this post is getting so many down votes. I mean it's not the best question, but not everyone would know that phone carriers are equally bad at privacy. Heck maybe in other countries there are some that help privacy.

  • I like all of it, except for that awful "texture healing". Imagine having words above & below like

     
        
    i=mins
    w=maxs
    
      

    But the m's just slightly don't line up because the top one is wider than the bottom one. I'd feel like my editor was gaslighting me 🤢

  • I was curious about this too and went through a few different news sources (BBC, yahoo, etc). Sadly all of them just repeated the same information.

    Maybe in a few days they'll have better details.

  • That's good to see a lot of the statistics are close, and I appreciate the sources.

    That said, for a full picture, I think you should mention that the average 20 year old doesn't have 18 gunshot wounds (365 wounds per 400 per year, is about 9.1 wounds per person per decade, or 18.2 wounds per 20 years per person)

    So I'd appreciate if you include a bullet point about that.

    • "at least 1 out of 400 shot everyday"
    • 365 shots per 400 people per year
    • or 9.1 shots per 1 person per decade

    The AVERAGE American has over 9 gunshot wounds? Man things are getting bad in the US.

    Note: The other statistics seem to mostly check out (see another guy's comment about that), which is great. It's just weird the gun one is so astronomically inaccurate.