It truly is a shame that this behaviour is considered acceptable in many games. I still report racist comms, but it's sometimes hard to manage as (a) it's near impossible to report 5 people chanting n****r all at once (b) they rarely get banned when you do.
It is incredible to me how little imagination these people have, acting like primary school children who just learned a bad word and now use it all the time.
In the EU, it is primarily russians and americans who engage in this behaviour (as far as I can recognise the accents). A downside of the sanctions is that many games no longer have russian servers.
I would like to see some legislation that "encourages" large multiplayer game server operators to police their online environments properly.
An apparmor profile is associated with an executable, based on its filesystem path. I think distributions tend to support either SELinux or Apparmor, but some (like Arch) support both.
Apparmor profiles are easier to reason about than SELinux, I find.
I have two apparmor profiles targeting shell scripts, which can run other programs. One is "audit" (permissive with logging) and the other is "safe" (enforcing).
The safe profile still has a lot of read access, but not to any directories or files with secrets or private data. Write access is only to the paths and files it needs, and I regularly extend it.
For a specific program that should have very restricted network access, I have some iptables (& ip6tables) rules that only apply to a particular gid, and I have a setgid wrapper script.
Note: This is all better than nothing, but proper segregation would be better. Running things on separate PCs, VMs or even unpriviliged containers.
You want to cut my hair for cheap? No, I am going to stab myself in the eye with the scissors. Haha, you lose.
Seriously though, tariffs can help (as part of a bigger strategy) to develop and protect important industries. You probably want a surgical approach in applying them, though.
If any of this actually happened (unlikely), I'd expect the US to start a very long slide to irrelevance.
Temporal is MIT licensed and comes with multi-tenant security features and its durable execution model is solid and scalability is phenomenal. They upsell to the cloud offering and the default OSS auth plugin is intentionally limited (you might want to develop your own if you self-host). You'd probably only look at the Temporal UI when debugging.
Windmill is very cool, but it is only suitable for trusted teams due to its security model. If you want to be able to develop scripts and workflows in the web browser and run them together with trusted colleagues, on a schedule etc., then windmill might just be for you!
25 or so years ago, I learnt Esperanto (my first second language) by chatting on the Internet. I'd have two windows open - one with the IRC client, and the other with a terminal and a shell script that would grep a txt file with consistent formatting. "esp esperantoVerbPrefix/" or "esp noun," or "esp affix-" would typically return the correct result in a split second. Thanks to the simple grammar (that I had quickly memorized), I could hold conversations in near real time as a result.
I wish I could have learnt my other languages as easily.
Well fuck, it looks like trump will win. We are in for a rough decade or two, and our children will quite possibly be called up to fight in a few years. Let's hope putin is defenstrated before it gets that far, of course.
Sure, ok. It's just odd to suggest that nazi germany was the first or has a claim to the word.
Fascism has a very long history, with many recognised variations. National Socialism (ie. Nazi state) is just one instance, and far from the first. Most people think of Mussolini's Italy when they think of fascism - also not the first though.
The word itself derives from the latin "fasces" (a bundle [of sticks]), and had political connotations back then.
A new Trump presidency will plunge the world into something between WW3 and nuclear annihilation.
Europe will have to dust off its own nukes as a serious deterrent to moscow and majorly increase its security spending and preparations, and Ukraine will have to develop its own (which it is perfectly capable of doing), with unpredictable results. If russia tries its luck outside Ukraine, there will be western troops clashing with russians directly.
China will smell weakness and go full throttle on its regional domination plans, and the US will do squat.
Expect a few assassination attempts/successes and unexplained deaths along the way, on almost every continent.
edit: I don't even want to think about the middle east. Without the US acting as a "moderating force", hell will probably break loose there too.
Sure, their accountants will have a little more paperwork, on top of their current workload. There is a cost to that. But if the total is well under the wealth tax threshold, there's no tax and little risk of an audit that re-evaluates it's worth. And if they are above it, then a small % of the excess will incur a tax.
If it is ever discovered that they failed to declare wealth (owned or controlled), THAT is when a penalty tax comes in, and they might find themselves obliged to pay $2mil in the US for that painting in Switzerland.
There is of course much more complexity to implementing this well. International treaties would need to be changed, to align reporting requirements and to limit loopholes that enable foreigners to avoid reporting and tax obligations (eg. an automatic wealth tax on foreign held assets in the absence of a tax treaty). There's cost there too.
This kind of thing gets discussed occasionally, but so far hasn't gained traction. Realistically, I don't expect it to.
NFSv3 (udp, stateless) was always as reliable as the network infra under Linux, I found. NFSv4 made things a bit more complicated.
You don't want any NAT / stateful connection tracking in the network path (anything that could hiccup and forget), and wired connections only for permanent storage mounts, of course.
Estimate it. As I clearly said, it is mostly about increasing transparency, for a greater understanding and better policy tomorrow. Turn those that hide their wealth from the tax authorities into criminals, while making compliance easy and cheap/mostly free.
Some countries now require you to pay a yearly future-tax-contribution on financial investments, which is then corrected at time of sale (eg. potential for a tax refund after selling a stock after it had a very bad year). Good or bad, I don't know.
It truly is a shame that this behaviour is considered acceptable in many games. I still report racist comms, but it's sometimes hard to manage as (a) it's near impossible to report 5 people chanting n****r all at once (b) they rarely get banned when you do.
It is incredible to me how little imagination these people have, acting like primary school children who just learned a bad word and now use it all the time.
In the EU, it is primarily russians and americans who engage in this behaviour (as far as I can recognise the accents). A downside of the sanctions is that many games no longer have russian servers.
I would like to see some legislation that "encourages" large multiplayer game server operators to police their online environments properly.