I can listen, I can mark for non-engagement, I can block (or is that worse?)... even if I still think it's not only nonsense, but also highly detrimental. Like, trying to keep a dialect segregated, because marginalized people want to... what, be more segregated? Seriously? Well, I can try, I still think that's wrong for all the possible reasons.
AAE is deeply rooted in black folks history
From a cursory search, there seem to be some expressions claimed as AAE that weren't a thing until the 2010s, colliding with non-AAE ones. That's not going to end well.
PS: should there be a "marginalized" tag for people? I still think of people of color as just people, and the profile description tells me nothing, or rather the opposite.
They're way too expensive, because not only you need a bunch of expensive certifications to become a contractor, but also win the contract, which often requires a CEO being golf-buddies with some government representative, which reduces competition and allows for increased profit margins... then the list of requirements turns out to be some "made by committee" list of features that take a whole team to even parse through, half of them being unrealistic or barely so.
What? Didn't China's clams encroach onto Malaysia's claims? Maybe they're not the ones with most to lose, compared to the Philippines or Vietnam, but still.
Once upon a time, caviar was considered worthless, just like salmon, lobster, and a bunch of other foods we now consider exclusive... while stuff like chicken or pie, were the exclusive expensive ones.
Russia is experiencing price increases all across the board, which kind of points towards a systemic issue.
So... when plugged into a system with ability to access the Internet and/or execute local commands... will its reasoning look better or worse than the high deception showed by o1?
It then goes on to say you should target ads for AI to people who don't know anytime about AI, since they'll see it as magical and buy in. Kinda gross, if you ask me.
That's marketing summarized: sell feelings, not facts.
Check most ads for cars, perfumes, airlines, even food. They don't focus on what they do better, but on how you will feel while using them. Even when they put some actual data here and there, it's often disguised as part of the "feel better" narrative.
Not exactly. US keeps making up money, and invests heavily into military to get everyone accept USD "or else". Russia thought it could coast on ex-USSR military, then skim off the top at every step of spending. They both need trade, but one has the means to enforce it, while the other doesn't.
The key to being a good propagandist, is to pick and choose only the parts that suit them, and hope most people didn't bother reading the actual source.
Once upon a time, I was Catholic, then read the Bible, then worked in SEO, then couldn't in good faith do either anymore.
Since you chose to single me out, I feel obligated to respond.
You keep conflating language with culture, then go off about how using a language, or parts of one, supposedly negates the struggles of a community, while someone pointing out the conflation makes them into supporting someone else's cultural appropriation.
Let me tell you now: no, it doesn't, your insistence on that conflation does... which I feel is not within the spirit of beehaw's rules.
Source: Polish raised in the Basque country, both places where quite recently using either the language or culture were punishable by death, both places just fine with other languages picking up some of theirs, and even some of their culture.
PS: guess I could have reported and blocked instead of posting the initial response, sometimes it's hard to decide whether words or blocks are a harsher response.
I can listen, I can mark for non-engagement, I can block (or is that worse?)... even if I still think it's not only nonsense, but also highly detrimental. Like, trying to keep a dialect segregated, because marginalized people want to... what, be more segregated? Seriously? Well, I can try, I still think that's wrong for all the possible reasons.
From a cursory search, there seem to be some expressions claimed as AAE that weren't a thing until the 2010s, colliding with non-AAE ones. That's not going to end well.
PS: should there be a "marginalized" tag for people? I still think of people of color as just people, and the profile description tells me nothing, or rather the opposite.