jack @ jack @monero.town

Posts

6

Comments

487

Joined

2 yr. ago

Oh, that's unfortunate

And after that you'll be stuck with an outdated distro again

And they literally took down a fan project recently...

If you mean Portal 64 you're misinformed at best

How do you get this black theme? I downloaded Gradient-Dark-GTK and set it for legacy applications in Tweaks but nothing changed

If you don't do what you preach I don't respect you

Good luck with that

"independent"

Thanks

Yes, there was the bourne sh on Unix but I don't see how that's relevant here. We're talking about operating systems in use. Please explain the downvotes

There is no sh shell. /bin/sh is just a symlink to bash or dash or zsh etc.

But yes, the question is valid why it compiles specifically to bash and not something posix-compliant

Are you complaining that they're going open source?

That's not Ross, that's David Schwimmer

Yes but git can be reasonable

Rude? That's a bit much

Thanks for your explanation, that makes sense. Was just curious what your take on this is, since a lot of CEOs made some very irrational decisions in the past like the recent Unity debacle or Reddit killing the community. Sometimes asking "what if" can help understand the situation. Of course with Linux we have all the options in case something bad happens

If you're into scripting anyways you have a lot more power on a Linux system. Windows was never intended for automation

What if Red Hat's CEO changes and the new one for some reason only wants to keep sponsoring Fedora if the direction drastically changes? The FESCo could decide that the continued sponsorship is what's most important for Fedora and now Red Hat could dictate over Fedora.

Hopefully that never happens and it doesn't seem too probable right now, but it's still a thought

I agree. Html could also be compared to a config file. Only parsed; it doesn't provide new instructions (unlike python etc)

Have you tried Linux?

So everything as usual