irmoz @ irmoz @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

245

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why so dramatic?

Throwing around misspelled, ableist insults won't save you from the embarrassment you've created for yourself.

It astonishes you to learn that discussing exponential growth is a mathematical subject?

Was the ellipsis indicative of your deep reasoning?

Well done at making a claim without any rationale. So proud. Now show how it's done.

Youtube blocks any attempt to comment with links

Did you learn about linear algebra through chat GPT? WTF even is "fit a curve"? Who says that? No, there's just not enough data to actually make that determination. There's barely any information on the Y axis, and the resolution of both axes is too low to make a precise reading of their values. You can only estimate.

Yes, those are dots

You're both discussing maths lmao

No, since you still seem to think it's the same as linear

Not enough information for a meaningful answer

What exactly are you trying to do with this comment?

Then I suppose we disagree on what "oppose" or "tolerate" mean

The uncertainty comes from reverse-engineering how a specific output relates to the prompt input. It uses extremely fuzzy logic to compute the answer to "What is the closest planet to the Sun?" We can't know which nodes in the neural network were triggered or in what order, so we can't precisely say how the answer was computed.

What exponential growth fundamentally is.

No, no, and no. Exponential growth is always exponential.

You are, you just don't know enough about the subject.

You can't genuinely oppose something and tolerate it at the same time, that's a contradiction

It's not an inherent obligation, but if you genuinely oppose those ideas, you'd feel compelled to argue against them if someone expressed them, or else remove yourself from the situation ASAP

Is that the way you think? You only argue with people to prove who you are to observers, or if it's your job?