interdimensionalmeme @ interdimensionalmeme @lemmy.ml

Posts

51

Comments

2,784

Joined

4 yr. ago

That's 2-3 communities for how many thousands of servers on the fediverse? Just because in the current growth phase tgere is not one clear winner, soon one will pull in front enough that it will grab all the new users.

This aspect of centralisation will recreate the toxic reddit dynamic of unstoppable mod power.

Yes, exactly, because I'm never going to visit every /book times the numbers of server on the fediverse and no one else ever will.

It HAS to all be in /c/books or else tgere will be only one server with /c/books that has over 80% of the user., defeating the point of decentralisation

I literally asked it to make the maximalist case against the idea that LLM are just autocomplete and that's exactly what it did.

The message before that did the opposite case.

That just opens the door for bots that can never be closed

Still less criminal than the admistration so very shaky ground for this claim.

All current drug problens themselves were created by republicans who they invented the drug war in the 70s intentionally to curtail free speech of Vietnam war protesters.

The drug over criminalization created the environement that directly leads to fentanyl being an optimal border crossing narcotic.

Drug dealers are more respectable right now than all administration members combined, even the "illegal" ones.

All very dubious for the most powerful country in the world, which rapes the entire planet for mineral ressources to call any human "illegal".

I speak for all humans when I say, this planet would be a lot better without the memetic infections known as America, China, Europe, India, Russia.

Maybe if they all had a nuclear fireworks party the survivors would have the opportunity to learn not to build those monstrous egregores.

So pokemon has lèse-majesté protections ?

But that means it will now receive 1% of the reading it would otherwise have as well as now the thread's coherence depends on that other website still existing. Which, in 2500 years, it probably won't.

At least it should be one-click easy to subscribe to all "books" communities on all federated server and to be able to click the following. /c/books

Enumerating users is not a security problem. It's platform obscurantism to even suggest that it is.

This is moderator empowerment at work. A structural flaw in lemmy that can only be solved with frictionless user migration, automatic community agglomeration like /c/books and crowd sourced moderation to diffuse tge concentrated power of moderators, that is the only way to prevent abuse and make lemmy more than reddit with extra steps.

The right answer is letting the user decide. The second answer is the user will scrape every post on every server on every hour so censorship becomes impossible. Sorry but instance owner and moderator empowerment over the users turn lemmy into reddit with extra steps.

Allow < 1MB sound files

When will anyone be able to click the following /c/books And see an agglomeration of all "books" communities on all federated server? I don't mean multireddits Thanks!!

When will users be able to frictionlessly migrate between instances without losing their posts, their comments, their history, their relationships, their reputation etc? (Without requiring the consent of the exiting instance owner, or that this server still even exists, as they sometimes don't)

That would means the disappearance of /new once enabled. It should be a smarter algorithm that gives you just a few of them to vote on and do your part on sorting. But that also means your feed is no longer strictly chronological.

What, "what? "

What did you not understand? I think I was very clear, use your words.

Very well, I already cut down 90% of external interactions, what is cutting cutting the last 10%. The mass down votes agree with my reasonning

I would have pasted it as a single comment, but that hit the character limit. So I split it in multiple comments. But now people aren't downvoting them equally, so the comments are getting out of order. These really have to be read in my posting order to understand what I did.

Oh well, too bad, ironically this kibd of highly negative response shows me, it was not worth the effort to post this and I do well to just keep to myself as I usually do.

Are you suggesting I did something other than I said I did?

How dare you sir!

What tipped you off was it when I left in "chatgpt said"

Or when I responded to the commenter who said he'd put the article in chatgpt to summarize that "he didn't" as a joke, and then added "but I did"