interceder270 @ interceder270 @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

985

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ostracization doesn’t work. Ever. Period. If they’re bad enough, banishment works. Ostracization is just literally ignoring the problem.

That's just wrong. Unless you're hanging around shitty people, ignoring the bad ones by definition works.

How are they more evil than average? What does Walmart do that Target, Whole Foods, and Kroger does not?

Yeah... it's almost like getting upset about this reinforces people's stereotypes.

The vast majority of people would have no idea this was a thing if there wasn't 'backlash.'

This generation loves getting mad over bullshit I swear. Prolly cause we have so much excess we need to make up things to worry about instead of helping those who have less than us.

🥱

Imagine caring about what losers say on the internet.

I think at some point kids need to learn that there won't be someone stopping them from doing bad things.

They need to suffer the consequences of their actions through social rejection. If the microcosm is so shitty that it doesn't ostracize people who disseminate nudes, then the people in it deserve to suffer until they improve.

This should be one of the easiest ways to identify shitbags, but I understand a lot of social hierarchies put shitbags at or near the top.

I mean, murder and theft is natural and predictable human behavior under the right circumstances.

At some point, communities and social circles need to be able to moderate themselves.

Disseminating nudes of peers should be grounds for ostracizing, but it really depends on the quality of people around you.

I think the best way to combat this is to ostracize anyone who participates in it.

Let it be a litmus test to see who is and is not worth hanging out with.

What about Target, Whole Foods, Kroger, etc? Are they exempt from what you're accusing Walmart of?

Red states are the poorest. "Get woke go broke" was always bullshit.

Crazy how people like you think Walmart is any more or less evil than the average for-profit corporation.

0% chance of happening. Amazon is on the downturn, Walmart is not.

Why would you want the grocery store with the best deals and largest presence outside of major cities to fail?

That's what I got from this.

Shitty how politics has become nothing but coded language that we need to decipher to figure out what's really going on.

That's exactly how it works. Why do you think it's more expensive to live in major cities than outside of them? Supply and demand. There's more demand and less supply. Why is there more demand? Because more people would prefer to live there.

Why should we invest in major cities that have already reached diminishing returns on their investments instead of spreading out to make more places attractive to more people? Entitlement. Life outside of major cities isn't good enough for some, and they think people living in major cities should get more before everyone else who has less.

Good to know. I've been concerned about finding host nations that let us do what we want.

Reading is so important. It should be free and accessible to everyone.

LOL

Yeah, I stopped buying'em when they started charging for 2nd internet.

Fucking rubes ruin everything I swear lol.

"As always, the paying user has the worst experience."

So true.