intensely_human @ intensely_human @lemm.ee

Posts

2

Comments

9,641

Joined

2 yr. ago

Can you link to one GOP member anywhere stating that their goal is

to target and oppress minority groups

?

Because I talk to lots of Republicans and I’ve never heard this motivation come up.

You know it’s true because it’s fun to say

The Catholic Church has always been creative with its execution methods

No! That’s impossible!

DIR 🤪

All too easy

Oh no not the CFPB

Dude your mom’s a sort of fediverse

Isn’t that what a fuse is?

Comrade, I'm an anarcho-communist

If you lived in a stateless society and people wanted to use money, would you try to stop them?

It’s as open source as Candy Crush is today.

The weights are the (rough) equivalent of a binary. If anything this is shareware more than it’s open source.

Yes. The algorithms are hard wired into the processor, and the rest is all data.

We should call it Open Matrix.

It sounds cool, and the weights are a matrix.

This is not a random question. I think it’s important to getting at the root of all this:

How exactly would he establish financial control over you, if you were to get in touch with him?

I’d say as long as that is a possibility, it indicates that there is a share of that control mechanism living in your own brain.

This tells me you have things you need to work out with yourself before you try to mend things with your father. Basically there’s no mechanism by which one adult can financially control another adult, without that second adult being an active participant in the process.

As a first step, you should figure out what latent software exists within you, that is ready to activate and provide him access to controlling your life.

Do you have a therapist? If not that’s good first step.

Leftists substitute sound effects for argumentation and feel not the slightest twinge of self doubt in the process.

Also, y’all only follow news sources that paint republicans as pure evil. You see no problem with this, based on your belief that honestly portraying republicans’ positions is the equivalent of being a nazi.

Or Democrats could be flexible and approve internet access vouchers for households with school-age children, accomplishing the goal of allowing kids to do their online homework without undermining the parents’ role in setting overall internet access limits for their kids.

My guess is he’s worried that if the school system starts distributing wifi hotspots which are to be used for educational purposes, then these will replace home wifi, and then someone will start putting explicit political bias into the definition of “for educational purposes” and you’ll have households that end up being blocked from certain political viewpoints as a result.

I'm genuinely asking

Ooh that’s promising

if they just get giddy with excitement at the thought of making things worse for other people.

oh.

If you’re actually curious what his thinking is, I’m happy to take a stab at explaining. Let me know.