iltg @ iltg @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

48

Joined

1 yr. ago

but humans are chromosomes apparently?

are you a preschooler?

then hydrogen can become helium and helium can become hydrogen, right?

yes, are you going to use "basic physics" too??

"what is the third gender" your deliberate misunderstanding and simplification of the issue is just bad faith debate. you're proving us that fractions are "syndromes" by using only integers. this is just a display of ignorance and bigotry, it doesn't really paint you as smart as you're trying to appear

thee are only 2 atoms in the universe: hydrogen (74%) and helium (24%). so you're either a Hydrogen, a Helium or have a syndrome

im moving the cutoff as i age and im not going to stop :p

"Can someone try and poke holes in this idea?"

you are still proposing a federate ad network. payments are left to crypto (not fedi), credit cards (not fedi) or paypal (not fedi). the shipping is done by shops themselves (not fedi) (also amazon handles ~80% of their deliveries, check in this thread for sources). What's a "main shop"? doesn't sound very decentralized. you suggest leaving contestation again to the shops to handle (not fedi).

what exactly are you fediversing here? the proposition to users would basically be a single view with all shops, but then just delegating to them? there can be value in this, i see it mostly as an ad network leveraging AP and I'm really not a fan. it isn't really amazon

being angered by being shown issues in your idea doesn't help your idea. go visit your local hackerspace and start building if you think we're just naysayers

you are not proposing a federated amazon, this is just federated ads and/or reviews.

how to process payments? how to ship goods? how to handle refunds? how to handle contestations?

please you can't just make anything federated. this protocol is built for social media and struggles to take over that sphere, we should focus on one thing rather than throwing random stuff at the wall hoping it sticks (cough federated tik tok cough)

this is an icky issue because lemmy sends votes with empty addressing, so remote instances should count them but not show them to anyone. however mastodon (and *key) sends likes with empty addressing too, but considers them public. lemmy is (surprisingly) right here and should request that the rest of fedi respects the protocol and hides stuff based on its addressing. maybe open issues on mastodon and friendica

also this issue probably exists when seeing lemmy posts on any microblogging instance

I would be SoL if I didn't have one of my original sessions upon making the account years ago still

key backups are a thing: element tries to make you save the recovery phrase. if you lost your recovery phrase and all sessions, you can still rotate keys and recover the account, just no encrypted history. it seems you're not familiar with matrix, not that the system is flawed

99% of rooms aren't encrypted so are completely and totally insecure anyway

if this is true, you wouldn't even be SoL if you lost your session: just rotate keys. very big rooms are unencrypted: what value does e2ee provide when the other end is 10k+ people? any of these may ne untrustworthy, you're just paying extra infra cost. also, if 99% of your rooms are unencrypted, how do you keep seeing encryption issues?

these statements seem excessively dramatic and in opposition with each other

you mention neochat and fluffychat. i explicitly said element, and element x on mobile

im rather upset at the fact that we have basically no choice: dendrite is getting left behind, construct is abandoned, conduit is weird and conduwuit is not super reassuring. on the clientside, fluffy mostly works but uses old crypto, cinny is slow and lacks a ton of stuff, nheko is a mess, fractal is really underfeatured and i don't even know what neochat is. using matrix basically boils down to "synapse+element(x)" or "lmao have fun fixing stuff"

it seems from your replies you lack understanding of how things work and are nonetheless choosing community clients rather than the stuff element does. super valid, i encourage you to do so, just maybe cast your judgment on the actual stuff you're using and not the whole project itself

i'd like to close saying that your anectodal experience is not of much value here: you are having issues? i'm not, and neither is all those i'm communicating with. what gives? it's instead observable that newer developments address the issues you're mentioning: transparent encryption and simplified sliding sync

element is entitled, ignoring feedback and constantly playing the victim. its practices with the protocol are despicable.

the protocol, however, works

while "Could not decrypt message" is the n1 meme for matrix, i haven't seen it happen in a long while, maybe a year. synapse and element x are quite good at this point, you should try matrix again

im not an element fan, company is a bit spoiled and sassy, but they stopped adding features and went all in on polishing recently. fair, as they're trying to sell themselves for national deploys

honestly hashtags is 100% lemmy's fault: groups/communities are "audience" AP field, lemmy some time ago aiming to be "more compatible with mastodon" made it so that posts in communities get automatically added an hashtag, and hashtags get sent into communities. this is honestly stupid and should be undone, you'd better aim your anger at lemmy devs.

regarding mentions, Twitter-like software needs them for addressing: lemmy implies that replies are addressed to replied-to user, other software doesn't (you may want to contribute to a conversation without mentioning user directly above). if they don't mention, you don't see it, you'll have to just deal with this. you could cook yourself a client that finds mentions in object "tag" and removes them from the body itself if you care this much

you're right, my initial reply was harsh, i wish i had waited a bit longer before replying. i hope my points won't get lost in the rant because i stand by them. i really wish this enthusiasm was spent on other hurdles rather than chasing big monoliths. i don't want to curb enthusiasm, just move it elsewhere

So let me get this straight. Are you really saying "we the developers are going to build this however we see fit, and you the user can go fuck yourself, or else learn how to code and build it yourself"?

you're putting it in rather extreme terms, but yes. even if you were completely right in your opinions, the person investing their free time to do work and sharing freely the result is entitled to work as greatly or badly as they like

Don't like the feedback? Great, feel free to ignore it, or tell me why I'm wrong

honestly yes I'm doing exactly this: I'm ignoring your suggestion and telling you why i think you're wrong. i also shared some of my reasoning behind which i think is still valid, and i will reiterate it

This alternative has existed for a long time, but still has a fraction of the users as other alternatives out there. Aren't you at least curious as to why that is?

not at all because i know a good reason for it: fediverse doesn't scale well if expected to replicate fully and be a "central plaza". every server owning every post from billions of users is a very prohibitive design, especially if you expect self-hosters funded by their wallet or donations

i really think we should try to change how we do social media, not make the same thing again. if you just want that, atproto is likely more fitting, AP is decentralized, not distributed! things like nomadic identity would make the "server issue" obsolete. replies collections permit on-demand fetching of replies. activity signing and forwarding could provide real network-wide broadcasts

if we're cooking ramen, we appreciate knowing if it's too salty or bland. coming to complain about ramen not tasting like burgers, and proposing to add some ketchup, is useless at best, a bit disrespectful at worst

this feels useless at best and entitled at most: if you want these, get working. this is not reddit or Facebook: there is no profit or product, nobody is making money and no money is being spent on development or making sure your requests are met. all the time you spent writing this or replying could have been spent actually researching the app. not a dev? not entitled to complain

simplify user sign ups

you're basically proposing a centralized service over a decentralized network. who runs that service? how is it guaranteed fair? which servers should be in the pool? what if a server is worse than another spec-wise? what if the assigned server shuts down? the solution to the server issue is you picking a server for your non techie friends, not cooking more centralized complexity on top.

polish/add functionalities

if you really want features developed, make a bounty! pay developers! expecting others to work for your appeasement for free is distastefully entitled. or do it yourself. as you can probably assess, expertise and free time don't grow on trees.

how to attract more users

i think most of this disconnect stems from you wanting this to be just like big centralized services. it's honestly delusional. in another reply you state that "lemmy.world couldn't handle 10M users". maybe, but decentralization is only going to make it worse. every lemmy server needs to broadcast every action to every other server which has users in that community. every post and like needs to be stored in all relevant instance dbs. this generates an insane amount of traffic and data. if the lemmy network suddenly gained 1000 servers, each with 10k users, the new replication traffic may stomp smaller instances to the ground.

the idea of a "global square" is naive and we should move over. it just limits us all because a platform which caters to everyone must be built around the common ground, and the common ground for everyone isn't that much ground. a platform that caters to everyone caters to no-one: see mainstream social media and how it's going. fedi is great because it's a whole different model: small islands which can interconnect. this is why picking a server is so important and you should not hide it from the user: you're not signing up to mastodon, you're signing up to furry.engineer or fosstodon! you can interact with the other instance just fine, but it matters where you register!

this is the core of the disconnect: we should not bend the fediverse to what mainstream social media is, we should either teach others about this or be fine living as a niche. auto enshittifying ourselves hoping to be another facebook or another reddit feels really silly to me

"us/them" mentality doesn't help much. this is surely a great fuss for a 3 year old pr but you're misrepresenting the situation:

• serenityOS (and consequently ladybird) has rather strict rules about wording documentation: they enforce language style and even date formats
• that wasn't a report, but a PR: rather than pressing ~50 keys on your keyboard and then a "lock" button he could have just pressed the "merge" button and integrated those ~10 total characters changes
• github issues are routinely used to fix wording: documentation often lives on git and it's useful to have it version controlled, even plain documents without attached source are kept on git so that their edit history is accessible and manageable

folks are making a big fuss but Andreas really set himself up: just say sorry and change 4 words, such a weird horse to die on

there are plenty of articles about regrets and resources about detransition, those who get shouted down usually try to use ridiculously low regret rates as reasoning to limit access to healthcare. marriage has a 43% regret rate, why isn't your energy spent there instead?

then use "they", do you speak exclusively with yourself? your linguistic choices affect others, just like others' linguistic choices affect you (as you were noticing and complaining about)

you don't understand the language and thus everyone should comply with you? i'd rather read correct english than what you find more understandable

nice whataboutism, "they should do this instead". oh they do, but you don't care when they do.

the delivery didn't deface anything, if you want to focus on the delivery and once again ignore the message at least be honest. willing or not, messages like this do BP bidding

comparing with mullvad is ridiculous and just shows how much you drank the apple juice without questioning

• mullvad doesn't hold your contact info, like apple right?
• mullvad is open source so you can independently verified which data is being sent, just like apple right?
• mullvad claims to not log anything, like apple and their csam thing on icloud right?

"leave alone the multi billion dollar corporation" energy