Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IL
Posts
2
Comments
1,822
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The angrier he gets the more unrelated imagined slights and enemies he pulls into his rants. One of these days he's going to be raving against Kamala Harris and toss in a reference to the very mean boys who bullied him during elementary school.

  • People have been complaining about WotC's executive meddling in D&D and MTG for as long as I can remember, since before the 1999 Hasbro purchase. D&D 3e, mostly written after WotC acquired TSR but published shortly after Hasbro acquired WotC, was panned so badly that they dropped 3.5 just a couple years later. And 4e (including the first OGL fiasco) happened when Hasbro didn't care about WotC because they were all-in on the Michael Bay Transformers movie. In fact, up until Stranger Things and Critical Role, Hasbro seems to have considered WotC the "Magic: The Gathering Money Printer" and done most of their meddling on that side of the house.

  • he also aimed for VP chair so one would expect him to act at "above state" level.

    Nope, one would expect him to do the job he was elected to do. And he is.

    We have way too many politicians already talking instead of acting. Working to alleviate real problems in Minnesota is way more effective, even on a nationwide level, than just talking.

    But he's also talking!

    how many public gatherings did he address and outlined strategy for applying pressure on current Federal administration?

    Several, and more coming.

  • I'm not a Minnesota resident, but it sure looks like he's taking direct and local action as the governor of Minnesota. The guy seems to have done a lot of good work for his constituents. As a governor, that's really the most effective action he can take right now.

  • They are cowards and weaklings who have no conviction in their actions.

    This exactly. They want all the power that comes with being in a successful coup but none of the risk of being in an unsuccessful one.

  • So the last one there--whether or not it's a moral idea, it's important to remember that Trump was shot. Eleven months ago today, actually. It did nothing to stop this, and it did nothing to slow down his followers. Now, I don't think that it particularly galvanized them, like some people say; but I also don't think it did anything to remind him of his own mortality. To the contrary: he talked about his survival as if it were the will of God.

    In February of 2001, the White House was shot at while Bush II was inside. Everything in the next seven years happened anyway. It doesn't seem to have made him any more receptive to the will or displeasure of the people.

    In 1994, something similar happened while Clinton was in the White House. He still served two terms, and not much seems to have changed about his demeanor or policies.

    Ronald Reagan was shot at and hit in 1981, but it took the nuclear near miss in 1983 for him to de-escalate his rhetoric.

    The attempted assassination of Nixon in February of 1974 doesn't seem to have done anything to speed up his resignation that August.

    For that matter, the successful assassination of JFK didn't stop Johnson from handling Vietnam so poorly, and didn't stop Nixon from being Nixon to begin with.

    So I'm frankly doubtful that assassination attempts--successful or otherwise--are at all effective in giving politicians any feeling of mortality.