Yes. The dental assistant insisted to the dentist after I started writhing. Flexing my leg muscles serves no function, but at that point I was doing anything to center myself.
Got more Lidocane. Felt better, continued procedure. They make the crowns in house, but by the time it was done, so was the second dose. They said I shouldn't be in pain, and they couldn't give me anything more. The final bit of drilling on my tooth-nubbin was excruciating and the UV resin curing was unexpected - it burns.
Speaking of fricken weird. I use one of the posts to make a template to use up some of the weird otters I had set aside. It's lame if the format is all the same, but it's quicker.
This comment is vertically long. Paragraphs and sentences are short.
There are two senses of the word "or." Inclusive and exclusive.
Inclusive | one, the other, or both
Exclusive | one, the other, but not both
In English, most instances are inclusive, like above. Exclusive might look like: Is the US President Joe Biden or not? Is that a square or circle, or neither?
I took you question to be you asking if the or was inclusive, but in a normal, funny way. The T/F statements define why 'both' can be an option. 'Both' might still be wrong factually, but logically, it's possible.
Yes. The dental assistant insisted to the dentist after I started writhing. Flexing my leg muscles serves no function, but at that point I was doing anything to center myself.
Got more Lidocane. Felt better, continued procedure. They make the crowns in house, but by the time it was done, so was the second dose. They said I shouldn't be in pain, and they couldn't give me anything more. The final bit of drilling on my tooth-nubbin was excruciating and the UV resin curing was unexpected - it burns.