ieatpillowtags @ ieatpillowtags @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

426

Joined

2 yr. ago

They’ll just cut it for anybody under 60 or whatever, and their base will cheer them on.

He sounds overly sensitive, I wouldn’t worry about it’

Pretty sure he is exactly that though, venal and stupid. Putin bought a president on the cheap.

Lied to yes, but also stupid and arrogant enough to believe it.

Do you reach into the bowl and eat your own poo? Is making unsupported statements followed by question marks a reasonable thing to do?

Well we do have laws against fraud, deceptive marketing, etc. It’s hard for me to imagine what we would be arresting someone for unless it were one of those already illegal acts.

It’s nice to say it should be illegal to take advantage of someone, but who decides if that happened, and by what criteria?

Just another opportunity for the oligarchs to buy more of our country at a discount!

Many states require a separation period before divorce, which means it’s not necessarily for repairing the relationship. That being said, with no plan to actually get divorced, I think we need more details to make any judgment.

…the purpose of people sitting out the election? You know, the topic of the comment you responded to?

They’re doing it as fast as they think they can get away with.

“Oh he could just carpet bomb all of Gaza and he hasn’t, ever think about whyyyyyyy”?

What an utterly ridiculous premise, and you’re explaining their actions on this? Just so pathetic.

Yes? Has been since before the rise of truly fake news on social media in the run up to the 2016 election.

It was all anti Hillary stuff, but of course the right is the embodiment of projection, and so trump latched on to the “fake news” term with glee to discredit any and all news that he didn’t like.

Not silence, just more bullshit unfortunately. I’ve seen them continue to defend their position.

Edit: In this post!

They do controlled burns, but the ability to do that safely has been hampered by years of drought conditions. At least Democrats admit climate change exists I guess?

That’s typically what you get in return for an investment. The only question is if it’s enough of a share to give control or at least influence.

Oh sorry I thought you had a point that you were trying to communicate! Like, it’s not for me, but for the people.

What a disingenuous deflection! Explain again how we’ll see “more of this”, which might be interpreted as banning harmful substances, so there’s an easy out for you! If only you would or could support your assertions…

Oh yay, you learned a native phrase! Your handler must be so proud 🥰.

Oh, except for the part where you put it no effort and just look like an idiot.

“The wheel is turning”, cool bro but towards what? “See much more of this”, but when asked what was meant by “this”, you responded, “this”.

You’re right, it’s my reading comprehension at issue.

Blah blah blah, and yet you still haven’t made a coherent point to respond to. Do you get paid by the word?

You people just don’t even try anymore, do you?