Or English comes from a broad range of roots, not just Latin, and you have a hard time admitting when you were wrong!
Not to mention you already conceded that it’s the current correct form of the word, and if you think language doesn’t change over time due to usage then you’re doubly ignorant.
I’m sure the quality of the curriculum varies greatly as education is largely controlled at the local level. I had excellent Spanish instruction available to me. In the last couple years of high school you had to read books in the language, and we weren’t allowed to use English in class.
Nothing drives me crazier than regulating your speed by hitting the brakes! Like, have you considered just…taking your foot off the gas? I promise, you’ll start to slow down!
It was a neologism associated with the eugenics movement (“created specifically for” appears to be editorializing on your part), more than 100 years ago. The word has LONG since lost any connection with that meaning, with the sole exception of virtue signaling like yours.
You made a claim about “more burnouts”, and when challenged decided to list every problem you could think of with weed instead of admitting you have no evidence for more burnouts.
You also appear to be conflating consequences associated with prohibition, such as academic ineligibility, with the effects of the actual drug. The point of decriminalizing is to stop ruining people’s lives over a drug.
Because this particular lie is the entire basis for the House impeachment inquiry, which is why this is newsworthy in the first place. People get charged with perjury all the time so that’s not news on it’s own.
What’s hard to understand? He made false statements to the FBI, giving fake info that his Russian handlers used to hurt Biden. He made those false statements under oath, which is known as perjury, a crime.
No no, language as it existed at the time I learned it is the FOREVER AND ONLY CORRECT WAY. -OP, probably.