ieatpillowtags @ ieatpillowtags @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

426

Joined

2 yr. ago

That’s exactly the point. The only remedy to this problem, given the structure of our government, is through the legislature. If you live in one of the shithole states, that’s going to be a challenge.

Hard not to be condescending in the face of such a childlike understanding of the world. Everything you’re arguing would be true in an ideal world, but that’s not what we have. I mean, have you been living under a rock while the science around climate change has been politicized and manipulated by monied interests?

I’ll remind you we are talking about the courts, and the autonomy of the States to make their own laws, and not about what makes good science.

And don’t police my tone while acting like an ass all over this thread, as you lack any moral high ground.

That’s a fun idea you have but you’re wrong. Who decides what the scientific consensus is? Is there some governing body that is accepted as the source of truth on what constitutes “abundantly” peer reviewed proof? No? Then it’s still subjective.

You don’t have to like it for it to be the reality of the situation, and the fact is that the precedent is extremely relevant. Your little fantasy world where teachers choose the material ignores the other side of the equation too, as I’m sure you wouldn’t want some evangelical deciding on his own to override the curriculum to suit his beliefs.

What was this? All I can find is the 2005 killing of an innocent man after the subway bombings.

The piss comment is a reference to an American idiom. I guess they missed that one in your training.

Nobody is talking about impeachment, you picked the wrong script. Talk to your boss and get the latest talking points.

I see you don’t understand how Congress works. You see, in America we don’t have a dictator who can do whatever the fuck he wants. I know things may be different where you’re from.

What they’re actually doing is super shady, and reason enough to cause concern without exaggerating.

Agreed, but the article title implies that they are in fact currently revealing names, which is just not the case.

I swear some people are just contrary.

It seems as though nobody in this thread actually read the article. They are not revealing user names on the site. The objection here is having the real name as part of your private profile data, in case of a future data breach. It’s a real concern, but orders of magnitude less serious than what everybody is assuming.

Shame on Ars for the misleading clickbait headline.

Sure bro, I can see you’ve got your talking points. Don’t forget to stick to the script, you’re doing great.

Culpable in the genocide? Yes. Carpet bombing anybody? No. Facts matter.

He said USA carpet bombing, not Israel. You wanna criticize arms sales to Israel, feel free. That’s a real problem, as opposed to the fake one presented by op.

What carpet bombing lol. You tankies love saying random provocative bullshit.

No need to be so defensive, champ.

Because your source of info is places you’ve lived at personally, and I assume a delivery driver would have seen a wider range of apartments than you. So without additional context, you seem to be making assumptions that most places would be like the ones you’ve seen, and “correcting” someone based on that assumption.

I’m not the delivery driver you replied to. I just thought it was dismissive to reply to a person saying “it’s difficult to figure out apt numbers” with a long explanation on why they’re wrong and how it’s actually easy.

What specifically about my post makes you think I’m angry? And defensive doesn’t even make sense as we haven’t spoken before. Maybe take a deep breath yeah?