Nice, sounds like you're definitely a candidate for manual espresso grinding, in which case that's what I'd go for. You'll definitely have a hard/impossible time finding anything anything as precise and consistent as 1ZPresso's esspresso-focused grinders at that price or looking at electric grinders.
Any drill/screwdriver with a 6.35mm socket (the widely standard size) can be attached to the same spot that the standard handle slides onto. That piece on the grinder is actually shaped like a standard hex bit, so it should fit just like any of the screwdriving heads would.
If it's light, but not sour, acidic, overly watery, or astringent, I might stick with what you have, and it tasting light may just be a function of coming from daily espresso (which I did, too).
That said, something I love about pour over is how easy it is to experiment. If you're using relatively light roast beans, you'll struggle to over-extract, so I'd definitely try going finer just to see what it does. It may end up producing less of the flavors that were giving a seemingly over-extracted taste, or at least balancing them with the natural sweetness and body of the coffee.
If it's a light roast, I might also (separately, so you can identify the effects of each change) try increasing the water temp. I do espresso at 89-90⁰C, but I'll crank my pour over heat to 98.9, even with a fine grind--though again, only with a light roast. It's MUCH easier to under-extract that in is to over with a light roast, and the effects of under-extraction can taste oddly similar to over-extraction with some beans.
If they aren't light roasted beans, grinding finer or going hotter can increase bitterness, so you've just got a much slimmer target for a perfect cup, and you may have to accept some bitterness or some lightness to get everything else in line with what you're looking for. What type of beans are you using, and at what temp? (Also, assuming you have a solid grinder?)
1ZPresso is amazing, just got the K-ultra a few months ago and it is my most consistent grinder, but hand grinding at espresso sizes is HARD. I'd run an experiment with your timemore and set it to near its finest grind and try to crank through 18-20g beans. You'll be able to do it for sure, but just make sure it's something you want to do every morning.
(Just for context, I'm a fairly fit guy used to hand grinding, but I have to get into position, hold the grinder against my leg, and lean over it to maximize torque in order to comfortably grind for espresso. I was shocked how different it was from even a fine pour over grind).
That said, if you have an electric screwdriver or a drill that can do super low RPMs, you can attach 1ZPresso grinders to those and basically make them electric/automatic.
You're not gonna see it on a lot of real enthusiast's lists, but I think the Breville Smart Grinder Pro at $200 is the best espresso grinder you can get (easily and consistently) below $300. I have a virtuoso+ that I was using for a while, and the cheaper SGP not only has MUCH greater micro-adjustability (it's essentially stepless since you can set to any point in between clicks, but there are still steps technically), but the grinds are much more consistent at espresso sizes. I've established this myself with a precise sifter to remove boulders and fines (virtuoso+ produces many more of both) and seen online analyses that show the same. SGP wins against the more expensive baratza every time on grind quality.
The biggest/most common knock against it is that it isn't built to be repaired as seriously as most Baratza, and some of the "smart" features aren't that useful. However, being so much cheaper than anything but the cheapest baratzas, I'd buy two of these over the course of 10+ years for grind quality alone rather than spend just as much replacing burrs on a baratza, but not technically having to buy a new grinder.
And yeah, the ability to grind by "cups" rather than time isn't helpful, I just do it by time, but it's not like they made that more difficult by adding a second option. What IS helpful and won't be found in any other grinder at the price, though, is a great portafilter switch and holder. Improves workflow, minimizes waste, and is just fun to use. I'd use a twist-on dosing funnel though so you don't have to spill/waste any grounds at all when grinding straight into the portafilter.
In the end, I make decisions like this based almost exclusively on functionality at a given price point, and SGP is a rare case in which a cheaper option actually performs better when you get down to grind quality alone, and the espresso-specific build/attachments are nice.
I use a chamois cloth, seems to pick up oil/smudges even better that microfiber and need less washing. Also super easy to wash when it does need it. I basically just cut a dollar bill sized section off a natural off-brand sham-wow and it works better than anything else I've used
Champion can technically also refer to a notable advocate for something, like a "champion of human rights," or even as a verb in the same way, "we champion diversity here at Tech Corp Z" etc.
As someone who works in content marketing, this is already untrue at the current quality of LLMs. It still requires a LOT of human oversight, which obviously it was not given in this example, but a good writer paired with knowledgeable use of LLMs is already significantly better than a good content writer alone.
Some examples are writing outside of a person's subject expertise at a relatively basic level. This used to take hours or days of entirely self-directed research on a given topic, even if the ultimate article was going to be written for beginners and therefore in broad strokes. With diligent fact-checking and ChatGPT alone, the whole process, including final copy, takes maybe 4 hours.
It's also an enormously useful research tool. Rather than poring over research journals, you can ask LLMs with academic plug-ins to give a list of studies that fit very specific criteria and link to full texts. Sometimes it misfires, of course, hence the need for a good writer still, but on average this can cut hours from journalistic and review pieces without harming (often improving) quality.
All the time writers save by having AI do legwork is then time they can instead spend improving the actual prose and content of an article, post, whatever it is. The folks I know who were hired as writers because they love writing and have incredible commitment to quality are actually happier now using AI and being more "productive" because it deals mostly with the shittiest parts of writing to a deadline and leaves the rest to the human.
An important note about this as an average--some hospitals have incredibly low hospital-acquired infection rates, and others are shockingly high. A HUGE factor is just how nice the facilities are and how well-trained the doctors are, which is why there are 3rd parties that evaluate as much for hospitals each year. Do your research and know where to go in your area that has scored highest on quality of care investigations!
Nice, sounds like you're definitely a candidate for manual espresso grinding, in which case that's what I'd go for. You'll definitely have a hard/impossible time finding anything anything as precise and consistent as 1ZPresso's esspresso-focused grinders at that price or looking at electric grinders.
Any drill/screwdriver with a 6.35mm socket (the widely standard size) can be attached to the same spot that the standard handle slides onto. That piece on the grinder is actually shaped like a standard hex bit, so it should fit just like any of the screwdriving heads would.