idkman @ idkman @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Aye!

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

70

Joined

2 yr. ago

What kind of question is this fool?

I started using it on a daily bases since I switched to Linux. The distro I use as daily driver and other large projects have their support team on IRC.

It is much much better than posting on forums. You get instant response.

This is quite thought provoking. I never thought in this manner.

Don't bother using collection. When I made one for personal use, the fucker downloaded some outdated version of the mod. I started using my download history to keep in check what I've downloaded and used vortex to handle the installation. Keeping bookmarks would be a better option.

In general, simply dropping the mods in the correct location installs the mod, but few mods (like in case of Cyberpunk 2077, Redmods) get compiled to show up as game files, which might complicated the proceduce but I think its possible.

I don't know what you mean by downloading one by one. Nexus does lets you download multiple mods at a time when done manually. When installing mods with Vortex, it downloads it, installs it, verifies it and looks for the next in the queue.

But if you are still keen to use more bandwidth, perhaps try using tor, see if Nexus allows it? I haven't checked on my end since I never really downloaded huge mods.

IIRC, Vortex can install manually downloaded mod files.

Note that mods are not piracy. Developers make toolkits to extend the longevity of the game.

Say what? How?

Aye!

I can assure you this is not the case.

I've tested Cyberpunk 2077 on Ubuntu (not my daily driver) and it works like you're playing on windows. Only downside is that you can't use ray tracing since Nvidia kept that tech proprietary and exclusive to windows for now.

See, Linux doesn't fully supports nvidia gpu, but still I'm having a great experience.

Is that qBittorrent? If you meant transmission as in the torrenting software, I've never used it. Before switching to qBit I was using aria2 😅.

Btw, thanks to all of you, the problem appears to be resolved. Its a matter of tracker requesting seeds now.

What are you talking about? Ofcourse everyone should worry about backdoors and other vulnerabilities. But I'm sceptical if bitlocker is the right solution.

On a serious note I use a lot of tools to circumvent those vulnerabilities.

Its a quote from GOT.

What Is Dead May Never Die

I've nothing against NSA_KEY nor Bitlocker, but anything in context with GAFAM I take it with grain of salt.

Some good news. It appears that the tracker didn't had anyone downloading the torrent while I was seeding it. Because I tried seeding a public torrent, and it worked without any issue (although it still states a warning of "no direct connection").

The executive log might just be handy. I was full of questions what is going without the software telling me what it isn't able to.

I'll keep a look out. I saw a few megabytes of upload on the private tracker. Lol.

I was just reusing the ports I've forwarded for i2p

I won't really trust Bitlocker coming from Microsoft.

where can I find the transmission settings?

It's a home PC with no VPN

How can I resolve that?

On my router config, under port forwarding, I've forwarded a port range of 9000-31000. Now qBittorrent is using 30000.

For testing. I've stopped firewalld too. Still no luck.

I reckon it has something to do with advance tab

It's off on private tracker