hsdkfr734r @ hsdkfr734r @feddit.nl

Posts

0

Comments

234

Joined

1 yr. ago

Your tent? It's Kyras tent for the time being. I'm sorry.

Thank you for the clarification. These points are indeed very similar to my thoughts (but I wouldn't have been able to describe it so to the point. )

I like to think I managed to represent the Musk-like interaction in my previous reply; responding to your well built message with a snarky comment. Although, I think, I went too far with the dual interpretations.

I didn't get that. So this part needed some explaining for me.

Why is your reply being down-voted

Maybe it is because I missed the sarcasm/ humour in your response. It's hard to know if it isn't written down as a response. :)

I'm not sure what you mean. The act is the same but the intention of it differs imo. Do you want to elaborate on the topic?

Even partially resorbed earth crust/ ingrown nail? Maybe. :)

Good.

Now repeat it with an ingrown nail.

I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

You might be confusing public IP addresses with ports?

I mean publicly addressable address like in: not in a private network where SNAT/ masquerading is in place between the torrent-client's host and the Internet.

It was mentioned, that no port forwarding is in place.

Not sure why you would sometimes see your status as fully connectable

One side of the connection needs a public address, not both. When both parties don't have a publicly addressable IP, the status is firewalled. I guess.

He used an inch tape measure and converted the height to cm I guess.

Just a few more fingers and tadaa... spider hands.

I'm impressed by the commitment to the joke.

That's a pyramid. (And an eleven-fingered Pythagoras depiction)

Must be one of those rare arctic forest dolphins. I'm almost certain.

Yes, that too.

Nooo. But thinking hurts my head. :)

It doesn't have to be limbo for everyone. Imagine if the manager stepped up for the employees, set the frame to work in and the right aims to achieve, used the strengths of his or her employees, took responsibility... things could be (more) fulfilling for everyone.

It also made me think. And it is a plausible future scenario. Enabling this behaviour could lead to said outcome.

Not bad at all. :)

This might be a backhanded compliment.

Let the patch be part of the code for one or two minor releases. Then revert the changes of the patch.

Oh wow, you're riding the wave here.

That is humour shaming!