Forgetting points that were already made is something that I commonly encounter, but I just attribute that to people being generally forgetful. I don't have any expectation of other people putting in much effort in rereading the whole thread before each response; so if someone forgets what was previously discussed, I'll just respond with a summary and continue from there.
The problem with the subscription feed is that it shows you every channel that you're subscribed to. If I only want to see cooking videos for example, then it has to be through the standard YouTube recommendations page. What it needs is the ability to manually group channels and let us choose which set of channels we want to see.
My days pretty much consist entirely of work, chores, gym, spending time with my kid, and sleeping. If not for the flexibility I get from work, I don't think I'd ever be able to do groceries.
If I saw "47% opposed privatization", I'd be here complaining that the title is trying to make people think that the majority (53%) support privatization.
I don't know if it's the same in Europe, but here in Canada, I've only seen the option to trade in old phones when you're buying one of the fancier phones with a bunch of bells and whistles I don't need. There no way they would give me enough for this phone to make up for the price difference.
Also, 40 months is an unusually long time to be holding on to the same phone? What?
As I understand from the other comments, it's a place to put the dishes after they've been cleaned and ready for rinsing? The way I've always done it is I clean the largest vessel first, then everything goes into that vessel until it fills up, then do a round of rinsing. If I don't have a large dirty vessel, I take out a large clean mixing bowl for this purpose.
I don't think the Mona Lisa is a good comparison. When it comes to old paintings, there's a lot of interesting stuff happening underneath the surface image that tell an interesting story. They can be analyzed to see all the mistakes that were corrected, or changes that were made to the painting. I believe it was also commonplace to reuse old canvases, so with the appropriate technology, you would in theory be able to look underneath and see everything that came before as well. So I can definitely see why that would be valuable.
It's so weird to me that a diamond can possibly go for that much. I understand that this one was probably made a long time ago based on the way it was cut, but it's not like we don't have the means to create an exact replica of it. This thing is pure carbon. There aren't even impurities to make it interesting.
Only worthwhile if you're independently pursuing your passion.