Pick the one everyone else is using. Your friend has a Hotmail? You make a Hotmail. Everyone switched to Gmail? You'll also switch to Gmail. Also for a lot of people, email is just email. They don't even know that you can choose a different provider.
Not to mention the time that you need to take out of your vacation to go shopping to replace those items. They were only there for a weekend so that would've been a pretty big chunk of it.
Not to mention the time that you need to take out of your vacation to go shopping to replace those items. They were only there for a weekend so that would've been a pretty big chunk of it.
Thanks, I appreciate the link. I'm a scientist by trade too, but not in a field where hazard ratios would be part of my repertoire.
My concern is not so much the quality of the publisher (though it's nice to know) or whether they used methods that are standard for these kinds of studies, but rather whether the general public is coming to the correct conclusions given what the researchers did.
So based on just this little excerpt, it seems that there's no casual relationship being established at all. They don't seem to claim any casual relationship either. On the other hand, the psypost article talks about it as if they did.
I don't have time to dive into this paper myself yet. Has anyone else been able to and can give a quick summary of that they did to infer the causal relationship from observational data?
Edit: Aaah, I don't have access to the paper. I guess this isn't happening.
What I'm noticing is a lot of uncertainty and I don't like that.
The US needs to take care of themselves too and if they need tariffs to do that, then it's perfectly fine. There's a limited number of things that can benefit them and we can plan around them if needed. The problem is that the current administration doesn't seem to care about the well-being of the country at all. There's little rhyme or reason to anything happening down there so literally anything can happen. You can't plan around that.
Asexuality isn't about sex drive. It's a question of where you direct sexual desires. If it's not directed at anyone (whether it's because it's non-existent, because it's undirected, or it's directed at fictional characters or objects), then that's asexual. Apparently, non-asexual people experience this thing where they see someone attractive and get a "I want to have sex with this specific person" feeling.
My experience has been that you basically restart the process of building a new social circle every few years. Life circumstances change. People move away. Some relationships grow apart. Some start families. So there's always going to be others in the same boat as you looking for new connections.
Ah, I didn't realize the moon could look bigger/smaller at different times. I thought you were saying that the moon is actually the same size as the sun or something like that.
Yes? I get the impression that you mean to disagree with me, but I can't tell how.
I don't know if my explanation of the phenomenon is correct or not. I don't know much about the science of traffic dynamics. All I know is that when you're on the road, pretty much everyone ends up at approximately the same speed. That speed can differ relative to the speed limit depending on time of day, road and weather conditions, which road you're on, etc. and there's no one to tell me what speed to aim for. I just look at the flow of traffic and follow it. That's all.
Shut down as in someone shut down the website or people telling you that the idea is trash?