hoshikarakitaridia @ hoshikarakitaridia @lemmy.world

Посты

3

Комментарии

591

Joined

2 yr. ago

This is important context. Very much limited.

Still, I don't like this.

Yes. Mistrial is only even something irreversible happens and the trial became unfair. If you didn't call bullshit at the time, you are not allowed to complain about everything later. And because you didn't object, there's also no preserved issue for appeal.

Btw I think the judge would be able to base their opinion in latches. But I might be wrong.

I was gonna say, that's hilarious but nah. I think that's what the judge thinks as well.

Legally speaking that's some bullshit.

This sounds kinda cool

Let him cook

Yeah it bothers me so much that ppl don't realize how the legal process works. If merchan makes any mistakes, his decision will get overturned. I want trump convicted and I want him to be unable to change that.

Looking at the European fascism trend, I'd vote an actual trashcan over those funko-pop Nazis.

Would be a shame if they were pressured into a permanent submarine vacation...

Stick will rot, rock will sit.

Yikes

Very progressive.

There we go that's what I was missing. Man I hate all that word mincing from online news.

RISC and CISC are two language which your CPU speaks, and which have different strengths and weaknesses. Reduced Instruction Set Computer vs. Complex Instruction Set Computer. It's something like Chinese vs. English. Either have a word for everything but that means there is a lot of words to learn, or have a smaller amount of words but that means you need more words to describe what you mean.

Highly technical; both been around for a while, and iirc usually CPUs use CISC, but RISC always retained it's strengths, so scientists are always looking into the difference in application for both.

Ngl I have no clue why this technology is so newsworthy rn but I know Western countries made a fuss about China activitely pushing the lesser used RISC architecture.

I think the right strategy is providing all the tools, and then the instances themselves have to stay attractive. That's not on the developers, that's on the instances themselves.

Putin might not have killed him, but he most definitely made him unable to compete in the election one way or the other.

You made me think about this for a second.

In my head, the reason is not specifically to punish the driver, but to make drivers always be aware and ready to take control again. Yes 100 ppl will have 1000 different ways to react to such a software error, but you need ppl to pay attention, and in law the only way is to use punishment. Obviously this needs to be well calculated but either you have multiple lines of defense (the software, the driver, maybe even additional safety features) or you have to remove the autonomous system.

Objection sustained, move on.

Can't tell if this is a shitpost or serious and I swear I'm trying

Objection, relevance.