It is very weaselly, but I gotta also note that this language is directly answering ethical obligations for judges.
Judges must not only avoid impropriety but also the appearance of impropriety (the judicial branch is only as strong as the will for people to believe in it. If a judge harms the confidence in this branch, they need to be removed).
So what he's saying here is that it doesn't matter if it's impropriety or appearance of impropriety, he has an obligation to step down.
Like I said, very slimy, but he's not just doing politicical rhetoric, he's directly addressing his ethical obligations.
"Rolling context window"? You mean one of the universal properties of LLMs in it's current state? The one that is so big for Google's latest AI endeavors that they are flexing with it?
It's hilarious to say that's a privacy feature. It's like calling amnesia a learning opportunity.
These claims make me think this is worse than the R1 rabbit or whatever it's called. Although it's very difficult to be worse, considering the CEO turned out to be a full-on crypto scammer.
I gave it another try and I'm starting to get into the flow of the game now. I will say it has a bit of higher entry barrier than you would expect, but I start to get why people love this game so much after it's countless updates.
Can recommend if you're into that space vibe where you just travel, discover, and build towards specific things.
God that's bad. This is what I'd expected Russian trolls to do on Lemmy before getting down voted into oblivion, but I wouldn't expect a CEO to do this. This is fucked up.
And because this could just enable government bodies to fuck around with spying, that's why usually you have to get a warrant for this kinda stuff on the grounds of probable cause.
Yeah I mean it's like bullying someone for not going into the finance field. It's not the others that are stupid, you are just being a dick for no reason at that point. They should at least hate on her for acting if at all.
Because currently there is no one standing before the court interested in transparency. That's only a lower priority obligation for the judge, and if the judge allows it maybe court TV, an independent journalist or other media can argue it through an amicus brief.
There's a few state sponsored media companies that are actually quite reputable. Al Jazeera has generally be seen as pretty neutral on reporting. Although there's some exceptions, but not as much as one would expect.
The best thing you can do is be nice to them and ignore passive aggression. Some ppl are not nice because they are scared and being defensive helps them, some are assholes, some are confused. Whatever it is, killing them with kindness actually works on a lot of people. The more you do it, the more people realize you are not faking your personality but this is just who you are, and they become more familiar with you.
If people don't react to your greetings, just walk as if they don't deserve your kindness, because it's true. Maybe someday they will.
