Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HE
Посты
6
Комментарии
203
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • If you think that has any relevance today then you're kidding yourself. Had the Axis won the war then Germany and Japan would be at eachothers' throats by now. Any alliance Nazi Germany had was one of convenience. They didn't honour their agreements. See: Russia.

    If you're looking for Nazis, look to America.

  • Then most companies have red flags. Not saying that shouldn't be changed, but it is the norm at present for the majority of industries. And if it were to change, that certainly doesn't negate an applicant's responsibility to research the company (and honestly the industry as a whole, but that's neither here nor there).

  • You probably will be able to. It will likely run about as well as Elden Ring does, though. Either way, wait until you get confirmation from other Linux users that it actually does work on Linux. Or buy and refund if it doesn't end up working.

  • I just want to know your reasoning on this. If you're interested in Nightreign, I can only assume that you've already played and enjoyed Elden Ring. Elden Ring itself uses EAC which is kernel level on Windows but is playable on Linux. There's no reason to suspect that Fromsoft would change the implementation of EAC since it has been proven to work for them and altering it would cost money. So I'm not sure I understand why you would avoid Nightreign given that you already have EAC on your system. Not asking this to be snarky or hostile, I just genuinely can't understand the motive here.

    And mind that I'm already avoiding Nightreign when it comes out since it sounds (to me) like a departure from Elden Ring's gameplay, so you can be sure that I'm not some Fromsoft stan mindlessly defending everything they make.

  • While that may be true, I still use my Steam Deck in desktop mode for a bunch of stuff besides gaming. Writing, job applications and interviews, using reddit because it's the only device I have that isn't detected for ban evasion, watching shows/Youtube. Maybe I'm atypical, but I don't see why the Deck would offer a desktop mode if it wasn't meant to be used.

  • It's a combination of exclusivity and IP. Mario, Zelda, etc. are beloved IPs with multiple great games based on them. They're also bound to Nintendo consoles. People will buy Nintendo consoles because they want to play those games. Fortnite, on the other hand, can be played on anything except Linux. It's not driving sales for anything except Windows keys. Furthermore, Epic exclusives aren't even fully exclusive (certain titles barred). Hitman 3 was exclusive on Epic Games for all of two minutes before it launched on Steam.

    What it boils down to is that if you own an IP that is in high demand, you can gate that IP behind another product because you have what's effectively a guaranteed market. If Epic pulled Fortnite from Xbox, Playstation, and PC and then released it on the Epic Games Assblaster 5000, I'm sure people would buy that to access Fortnite. Maybe even Fall Guys, though I doubt it.

    But, I suppose it could go a different way. Imagine the uproar if Valve released Half Life 3 as a Steam Deck exclusive lmao.