hdnsmbt @ hdnsmbt @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

193

Joined

2 yr. ago

Don't we already have like three "millennials after facing 3 major crises in their lifetime" memes? Why did we need a will smith one? They're all the same joke with different pictures.

100% surge is legit

I think you misunderstand my point. I'm not saying those shows lay down any laws. I'm saying you (the viewer) shouldn't derive any universal laws from consequences or situations depicted in stories made up specifically for entertainment.

I've been watching more realistic super hero shows like The Boys and Invincible. The reoccurring themes is that with great power comes great immorality.

You know that those were still written by humans to tell a story, right? I wouldn't derive any universal laws from them.

okay SO, yeah, well, anyway, okay like, there's this HILARIOUS RIVELRY going on between those two teachers I no and it's all written DOWN in scientifatic PAPERS that are publicly available for anyone but I won't LINK them because shirley my badly spelt TALE of what happened sprinkled with RANDOM capitalized WORDS is much more HILARIOUS than anybody readings it FOR themselves

Yes, I have.

Well, neither are Catholics, so that works out.

Is this the first time you realize that your life and experiences are not a template for anyone else's life and experiences?

Sarcasm works best for me when I have to explain that I'm using sarcasm. I just used sarcasm right there.

See?

The first one of these was really funny but none of the derivates that came after ever reached that level.

So, this is the famous "land of the free" yanks keep gushing about? I'll pass.

If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead!

Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.

You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.

If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.

I don't believe I made any comment about what's "inherently attractive" or "reasonable" to "wear on your face". What's with the loaded question?

And yet men go for the women with long eyelashes. Just because men aren't aware of it doesn't mean the women's moves don't work.

But even if they didn't, imagine this: Women can change the way they look entirely without wanting to look hotter for men. Shocking, I know.

Well, if it has been strongly condemned, surely the IDF will have learned its lesson now.

How many variations of this joke do we really need, though?

Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know all those details.

Also don't forget to mention it at every opportunity. The rapist Donald Trump must be called exactly that so people don't forget we're talking about a convicted rapist who for some reason is not a registered sex offender which, of course, doesn't mean he's any less of a rapist, which Donald Trump verifiably is.

That actually looks very fresh and not old at all.

I wouldn't call it "thinking". Conservatives react more than anything. They react to progress (--> hate), change (--> hate) and things they're not familiar with (--> hate). They don't pro-actively think per se.