I can write a manifesto that says "when I'm king I will make the sun rise in the morning and make it go down in the evening". That doesn't mean I'm responsible for that.
You successfully dragged me into an argument over something that was never my point and I will respectfully end it now.
The entire world is shifting right, it's what happens in less economically stable times. Granted, Americans may actually sit by, watching their country slip into even more authoritarianism but I think you're putting way too much weight on this stupid manifesto.
So, what you're saying is it'll happen regardless of trump winning or losing? Because all I said is that trump is a blowhard that quickly loses interest, a point that still stands and has nothing to do with project25.
Um, you brought up democrats when you said a democrat being president didn't stop its momentum and "the loss of rights is happening under democrats watch".
No, my response is, democrats act on a 20-year-plan by Charlie Kirk, really? Or is it possible the causation you see is merely a correlation? "The loss of rights" seems awfully vague to me. What policies did democrats specifically implement that go back to that manifesto?
These idiots are not going to magically be in the majority over night. How many tough guys write manifestos like that every day? Sorry I'm not scared by some big words by Charlie Kirk.
I really appreciate your analysis of what I can and can't understand along with your obnoxious pendatry. Very valuable information, thank you. Now kindly fuck off.
"I'm gonna use a word I really shouldn't use. But people might get mad at me for doing so. But on the other hand, the word is really edgy and cool... That's it! I'll just cover up part of the word so people don't notice I'm using it! I'm so smart!"
The real POV would be a closed bedroom door.