havokdj @ havokdj @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

753

Joined

2 yr. ago

Because they directly reference it for their politics

Darth Pelagius the Wise?

Tell her I'm bad so she can pick me up and slap me

This experiment would take a minimum of 9 tries to observe

King Crab 🦀

I was about to make a meme until I read it further.

That sucks man, I don't have anything else to say.

That tape is not to scale

I'm posting from mobile so I was not aware of that, but I had read the rules previously and was not aware that this was not allowed per board rules.

Regardless of what I think though, I am sorry for what I did, I was ignorant of that rule and had not known that it wasn't allowed here. I genuinely thought you were just singling me out and am now aware that you are just doing your job.

Once again, I am sorry, I will try to do better.

So why would you remove it rather than give me the opportunity to edit the word out?

It's pretty clear that I was not being ableist because the other party does not have a mental handicap of any kind. So it is okay to use other phrases meant to shock and offend someone but not that specific word? How is calling him a dumbass or an idiot any better? In the context of ableism, if he were to have a mental handicap, those words would be equally as offensive.

I hate to say this, but if you are going to partake in political discussion, you have to get ready to hear things that will be offensive to you. Essentially everything that I wrote has been censored because of a single word that is synonymous with so many other words.

I also would like to make it clear that I have a condition that would be categorized as "offensive" by that word, and even then I still fail to understand how that word would be any more offensive than any other word relating to belittling someone's intelligence, that was the entire point of my choice of the word, to convey OFFENSE. It is okay to use offensive language when it is not connected to hate or hate speech.

That is precisely why I think my post was actually deleted was because you do not agree with what I said. If you can prove to me exactly how that word would be any more offensive than the other choices, then I am totally open to what you have to say (and I actually mean that).

Wrong can be subjective too.

BLOOD FOR THE MENSTRUAL GOD

PADS FOR THE COOCHIE THRONE

Let's be honest here, you removed it because you don't agree with what I said, and used a word that I didn't use in an ableist context as a reason to remove it.

I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation.

I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it.

Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely.

It's because illegal substances have a negative connotation of them. It's ironic because they are not only physically safer than legal substances, but they are also both cheaper and have higher recreational value than them.

Also, if the masses started doing psychedelics, it would be the downfall of capitalism as everyone begins to realize that the world's governments and corporations are full of shit. Psychedelics really are the metaphorical third eye opener they are touted to be.

I was referring specifically to the drivers license which is used in place of the standard ID.

Hello, are you the living entity known as ChaoticNeutralCzech?

Really should happen to be honest, paired with a mandatory education class and requirement of a license. You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc.

Just give the people what they want FFS.