I'm suspicious. WoW added quality to crafting recently and it kind of sucks. This looks like a much more thoughtful approach, but I'm still skeptical that it will actually be fun and not a headache.
Death Stranding makes the player think about how to walk over difficult terrain with a large amount of cargo on their back without losing their balance and falling down. Most games allow you to run as far and recklessly as you want without having to worry about falling, so it was interesting to actually have to work at it, at least before you unlock various modes of transportation.
How fast do you need your phone to be for sending messages, streaming video, or browsing the web? Every phone made in the last decade can do these things.
Teams definitely feels bloated, but having used it for years at my lost job, I can't say I ever found it buggy. The only issue I ever had with it was actually with my bluetooth headset sometimes not being recognized, but it was never clear if that was an issue with Teams, or Windows, or the headset itself.
The Outlook integration for planning and joining meetings was super handy. If there was some way to get email in Teams then I never would have had to open Outlook again. That would have been nice.
I think the features need a lot of refinement, though. Having threaded and non-threaded chats is clumsy at best. I found the threaded chats to be far inferior, and the inability to search for non-threaded chats was very limiting. Search in general was borderline useless.
While I do enjoy cheesing fights in BG3, I've run into a few which seemed impossible if I didn't find a way to cheese it, which is kind of a bummer. Shoving the big bad off a cliff should be a strategy, but shouldn't be the only one.
I enjoyed the ship battles in Assassin's Creed 4 way more than the platforming and main story. I probably spent twice as much time at sea as I did on land.
The key differentiator between these and proprietary offerings will always be the training data. Large amounts of high-quality data will be more difficult for an individual or a small team to source. If lawsuits like this one block ingestion of otherwise publicly-available data, we could have a future where copyright holders charge AI builders for access to their data. If that happens, "knowledge" could become exclusive to various AI platforms much the same way popular shows or movies are exclusive to streaming platforms.
So you want Epson to provide you with a separately application which runs in the background to tell you when to update? Why split the responsibility?