Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HA
Posts
0
Comments
421
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Sure! No problem. I can tell reason and rhetoric is not your strong suit!

    You see, if we agree that people living in rural America have it worse than those in urban America, then why should those in urban America get more before those in rural America? If they can't afford it, especially. Why should they get more before those who have less?

    Textbook entitlement. And you all pretend not to understand it because you're in on it.

    Have fun waiting for someone else to solve your problems for you.

  • people are ENTITLED to a place to live without being gouged their whole lives.

    And these people have options to avoid that. The problem is, they refuse to take them because they feel they are entitled to live in places they can barely afford.

    Why do you people always replace arguments with your own misunderstandings as though you have a point? I think it's because you spend too much time on these forums and lose touch with what makes an effective argument.

    Here, all that matters is that people agree with you. Being correct or logical is irrelevant.

  • You still can, you just need to leave major cities.

    Unfortunately, entitlement goes both ways for renters and landlords. They think they're entitled to maximize profit, you think you're entitled to live in places you can't afford.

    Just unchecked greed all around, and the real people who suffer are the ones living in areas "not good enough" for you. But hey, you should get more before them, right?

    Edit to all the downvoters: wake me up when somebody else solves your problems for you. I can wait.