harderian729 @ harderian729 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

421

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sorry, I'm done arguing with you.

It's clear you just want to keep responding, so I'll give you the last response.

Goodbye.

I've come across many people like you and it always ends the same.

You refuse to acknowledge how a slow loss is still a loss and go into "recruitment" mode.

It's really just a instinctive response at this point, and I never expect anything more from you.

Goodbye.

Gangs are the ones that justify cops’ existence, though. Without cops, gangs will just have their way with everyone like they do in Mexico and did in El Salvador.

We experimented with not having cops in CHAZ and gangs started killing people very quickly.

I'm going to block you by the way. You keep following me around and replying to all of my comments adnauseam with useless information. It's very weird.

Goodbye.

They both can be concerns.

Gangs are the ones that justify cops' existence, though. Without cops, gangs will just have their way with everyone like they do in Mexico and did in El Salvador.

We experimented with not having cops in CHAZ and gangs started killing people very quickly.

That’s the Republican way of thinking for sure. “Oh, it didn’t personally impact me? I don’t care.”

You literally asked if it would be worse for me.

You’re a fool if you think Trump would be anything but catastrophic for the world.

Yeah, people said the same thing in 2016. Then the democrats nominated Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, guaranteeing a Trump victory.

Just goes to show, Trump is preferable to a candidate who actually fights for commoners.

This is what I mean by we're losing no matter what. I don't think you're capable of understanding this, though.

Sad how you feel justified in calling others 'fools.'

Calm down.

Not really. It can be cheaper while maintaining due process.

I don't think you're capable of understanding this, though.

unlawful

Keep improving your vocabulary.

Yes you did, but that's fine if you don't want to.

I don't expect you to articulate your argument because you're not confident in it.

It's the death penalty.

"Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder

You should really brush up on your vocabulary and reading comprehension before thinking you have a point and swearing at me.

Most of you people never argue in good faith and are just looking to farm upvotes.

Thanks for proving my point.

Calm down. I already said "punishing criminals does not need to be as expensive as it is."

It's possible to do it for cheaper, even if we choose not to. You really should take a break.

Use your words.

It doesn't need to.

Awful rule.

Are there any instances that don't bend to their corporate overlords?

Yuzu devs are a bunch of cucks.

Glad I'm not having any issues with the version I'm currently using.

Me? No.

The only impact this really has on me is seeing how everyone else reacts. My life was remarkably similar under Trump, Biden, and Obama.

This is what losing feels like.

Neither candidate represents my interests so I lose either way.

Welcome to American politics.

Agreed. Those downvoting you are useful idiots who don't realize there's a trade war going on between the US and China.

This is all an effort to look out for our respective rulers.

No it wouldn't.

This guy gets it.

All the discussion around banning Tiktok is just so an American company can take its place.

Useful idiots and tools don't understand this, though.