Sensationalist headline, trading journalistic integrity for website clicks. But I suppose "shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years" doesn't draw as much attention.
Same, and I was getting concerned when I got halfway down the list and I didn't see it yet. I've always liked the pterodactyl as well, because it's basically the closest we'll get to a wyvern.
The gun firing is probably not quite as bad because I assume most of the time it wouldn't actually be loaded.
Assumptions are typically frowned upon when dealing with munitions. Not to imply that you're incorrect with that line of thought. The issue comes into play when the tank operator makes the same assumption and happens to get a little cold. Guns really should only have one trigger.
I love how the AI art understands that there should be more stuff in a sub. There's pipes and wires in that image, where on the now crushed sub, it was a smooth room into which they were bolted. Even the AI image controller has a wire on it.
I think we're going to see a lot more of this over the next month, and it will be mentioned at sentencing in a bid for less or no jail time. If he goes to jail, it will ramp up even more, and we'll see headlines in the vein of "Trump is a crazy old man, compassionate release on the table?"
That's what my first thoughts were as well, but they were flying in some pretty nasty weather. Thick fog, high winds, in a remote forested mountain range. While it is entirely possible that the CIA and IDF may have collaborated on some impromptu helicopter modifications, I think the question is less "Who could have done this?" and is more "Why were they flying in those conditions?"
In a similar vein, what this guy discusses in his articles is like embracing that kind of training. "Here are old tactics that no longer apply, and in situations you won't find yourself in. Good luck."
Carriers don't go out alone, they move in strike groups. The battleship tactics he says won't work are so obviously obsolete that this whole article was pointless to the point where it didn't need to be written. It would be like if he wrote an article about the war in Gaza titled: "Cavalry Charges: Useless?"
This guy's articles are full of views that look at ships, mostly carriers and battleships, in a vaccuum against the entirety of China's costal defenses.
He completely disregards modern naval tactics in multiple articles in order to make his points, which all seem to be fearmongering about the threat China would pose if the US ever chose to invade.
I get the impression that his understanding of modern naval combat comes from playing with boats while in his bathtub.
If they only had Iron Dome, they'd only be able to defend. I agree with you, though. Take away their stick and see how well they get along with their neighbors.
Certain weapons like Iron Dome interceptors can only really be used for that purpose. I'm sure if Hamas got their hands on the interceptors, they would make clever use of the warheads.
But I do agree with you. Whose to say they don't have enough munitions stockpiled already to shell Gaza for years to come? Or maybe purchase under the table from other supportive countries in Europe?
halyk.the.red @ halykthered @lemmy.ml Posts 1Comments 402Joined 2 yr. ago
Sensationalist headline, trading journalistic integrity for website clicks. But I suppose "shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years" doesn't draw as much attention.