halcyoncmdr @ halcyoncmdr @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,751

Joined

2 yr. ago

They never are. They all know they are inferior in every way, so they overcompensate by claiming their genes are actually better than everyone else.

To be fair, that was also 6 years ago. A lot can happen in 6 years. That was pre-COVID for instance. I think just about everyone can say we're in a totally different place now than we were then, even without the Epstein aspect.

That being said, I always have pause when there's any sort of whistleblower or accuser of a powerful individual that commits suicide. Even if the suicide itself is accurate and clearly intentional, the circumstances surrounding it are always murky and questionable. Especially questions of threats and coercion leading up to it.

They'd be pissed, if they knew it was happening. The politicians don't care, it's part of the plan. Conservative media doesn't report it because an uneducated populace is easier to control.

No you're thinking too small. You use the billions of images and hours of video of Musk and Trump and use that to deep fake a very long and passionate gay sex tape scene. Fuck, you could probably commission two actors to make a new scene for free given those bastards views on non-conformative sexuality, then you wouldn't even be able to match it to a non-deepfake original.

We know there's nothing more directly personal that those two think about than sex.

No this is certainly malice. She's being punished for fighting back against the obviously illegal shit the government is doing. They're trying to make an example out of the family.

These are classic signs of abusive relationships, regardless of autism.

Trying to control and limit your interactions with others. Convincing you to abandon other friendships because those relationships pose a threat to their control over you. Preying on your own insecurities to further increase their power.

The same way Spam emails work. Spit shit everywhere and get that 0.000000001% return click, but it costs you almost nothing to put it out.

The account gets history with actual posts, and if it survives without being banned for spam, will eventually be cleared of posts and sold as an established account.

Of course they haven't. The ACA was their healthcare plan. Nearly everything the Dems originally wanted was stripped by the time it was passed. It's an almost copy-paste of Romneycare just on a national scale.

That depends on your description of development. Socially, economically, etc we have reverted and are doing the same things that failed 100 years ago. But there have been breakthroughs elsewhere.

Cas9 gene editing through CRISPR has opened a ton of incredibly valuable medical options around that time. The same with mRNA vaccination breakthroughs leading into the COVID era.

The biggest barrier to widespread adoption is the portion of the toxic parts of the general community. You know who they are, you see them all the time. They exist across all distros, and they seem to go out of their way to make the experience as miserable as possible when new users are asking simple questions.

They often are some of the first people new users interact with when needing help transitioning over. They seek out those beginner questions to act superior, and just turn the average user off to the point they decide to never try it again.

Without strong moderation to reduce that dipshit commentary, the Linux community will always be working against mainstream adoption.

The answer is of course Neelix. That's just objectively obvious.

This specific thread is talking about transacting business and banking online. You should be more careful to keep your arguments separated. Otherwise you not only look like an idiot but you also prove you can't multitask for shit.

Are you stupid enough to actually think the Internet is a closed system?

Their endowment as it sits essentially allows them to operate for something like a decade without any external money. And you can guarantee they'll get a bump in alumni donations if external funding is removed like that.

Instead you just have to trust that anything you're doing is actually with who they claim to be. No encryption means no identity or security guarantee.

Much more likely is that it never existed. All the "savings" are programs that already paid out, or have contract penalties for early termination, were lies based on misunderstanding how the programs worked like tax rebates being counted as money already paid, etc.

DOGE has already had to walk back savings claims multiple times when it's pointed out publicly that they can't do basic math or know how the systems work to base their inflated numbers on.

And notably, Japan does not have broad fair use copyright exceptions like the US. There are a very specific set of circumstances where it applies, and Generative AI for sure is not one of those.

Please may be useless. Thank you isn't useless. That tells you that the prior response gave them the answer they were looking for. No response at all could mean that, or that they gave up, or any number of other things.

Why bother with that? That's gonna be $1000 just for the box alone, and still lock me into the Synology ecosystem.

I can build a NAS with more capability for less than that. Like taking a Jonsbo NAS case and have the freedom to do whatever I want with it, with plenty of space to move everything else I'm running over to that as well. Even their N5 would likely be less expensive, and I'd have room for 12 HDDs and 4 SSDs then.

The only obstacles are a general lack of real world experience.

Both Thorium and Uranium were being researched in the 60s, but only one can readily be made into nuclear weaponry. So that's where the research was focused, and not just in the US. Thorium molten salt reactors aren't a particularly new idea, they date back to the same time period.

Now that nuclear weaponry isn't the focus, we're finally seeing real research like this in alternative nuclear sources. Thorium is much more abundant than Uranium, and is fairly readily available worldwide. The byproducts are much less reactive, and the amount of nuclear "waste" is a fraction of uranium. Even there though, the nuclear waste issue has been blown way out of proportion. Most nuclear waste is not long term, only a small fraction is the stuff that lasts thousands of years, and the US already has more than enough storage built to store all long term nuclear waste for every reactor in operation several times over. But most of the programs to actually implement these processes have been cancelled because of various anti-nuclear and NIMBY groups. So instead in most cases... That waste just gets stored on site, at the nuclear plant. Which isn't particularly an issue, but I think we can all agree is the worst option of all if you're worried about potential contamination.