Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GR
Posts
51
Comments
8,222
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This was part of an overall plan to get American hostages released.

    It was part of an overall plan to commit treason in order to sabotage Carter by preventing the hostages from being released before the election so that Reagan would win.

  • Not really, no. There is one toxic asshole peddling hate and misinformation that I reported multiple times and would very much like to see banned, but that is not a good reason for me to be given mod powers. I was just in the thread where I encountered him from browsing 'all,' not because I have any particular interest in that community.

  • “Ideological” pretty much covers everything else. A threat to kill is an act of terrorism.

    "Ideological" does not cover:

    • threatening to kill someone while robbing them
    • threatening to kill someone because you're high off your gourd and hallucinating that they're a space alien
    • threatening to kill someone because they fucked your wife
    • threatening to kill someone because they're threatening you and you're acting in retaliation or self defense.

    There are lots of situations in which a threat to kill is not terrorism. Quit trying to dilute the definition of terrorism.

    Oh, and she sung a song in Spanish, and was threatened with death for not singing in American English. That screams political to me…

    Okay, and...? I never disputed that this situation counted as terrorism; I only took issue with your overly-broad definition. In fact, it's doubly weird that you're choosing to die on this hill because you didn't even need to go overboard making the definition wider than it is when the situation easily meets the real definition of it anyway! The guy you initially replied to was wrong and you would have been correct, except that you overstated your argument for no good reason.

    Words have meanings and you're using one of them wrong. That's all.

  • Ernest P. Worrell, of course!

    https://youtu.be/G1G7KQZpP3c?t=42

    Jim Varney's character --- with "knowwhatImean, Vern?" as his catchphrase --- was so successful that he went from doing cheap commercials for local TV to become a legitimate movie star.

  • But help me understand how it’s possible that our “free market” is enabling this, unless it’s just a controlled market charading as free?

    John Deere is relying on DRM enforced by copyright law, which, being a literal government-granted monopoly, is as anti-free-market as it gets.

  • Years ago, folks hacked a Jeep Wrangler remotely, with a WIRED reporter in the car: https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

    That freaked the shit out of vehicle manufacturers. It led to encrypted CANBus messages: https://dev.to/living_syn/can-bus-message-security-3h43

    In other words, they deliberately learned exactly the wrong thing from that: they could have taken it as a lesson to not have a fucking transceiver in the damn thing so it couldn't receive remote messages in the first place, but instead they used it as an self-serving excuse to implement anti-consumer and anti-third-party-repair bullshit.

  • It’s also really expensive but it feels like being in the sort of store you’d go to if you were rich, not like being ripped off.

    That's kinda how Whole Foods used to feel, before Amazon bought it.

  • Lemmy markdown --- which is better than Reddit markdown in some ways, but worse in others --- will automatically do a similar conversion, except it takes three hyphens instead of two (two hyphens gets you an en dash). It's nice, but also unfortunate because it messes up people's muscle memory since using only two for it mimics what was customary when writing in ASCII, on mechanical typewriters, etc.

  • Do you think even all the charities put together come close to fixing the problem? 'Cause they don't, which you would understand if you'd actually bothered to avail yourself of the info you asked for beyond your "short wikipedia scan."