Maybe I have the low, low standards of "does it run at all and I can stand to look at it" lol, in which it performs pretty well! I definitely wasn't planning on playing current release AAA games on the deck so anything that runs I'm pleasantly surprised.
My wife played the beta version on the deck last summer, and let me tell you, that version was baaaaad. It's really improved with the new upscaling!
I can vouch for BG3, it runs surprisingly well (fans going to the max of course). I have graphics on medium with the upscaling AMD FSR 2.2 on and it's perfectly fine on both the small screen and connected to the TV.
Re: OP's thoughts, I also have a desktop but usually my spouse is on it :) The SteamDeck also travels a lot nicer of course!
I think you have identified some small truth, but have made an error in narrowing the scope of where the deficiency actually lies to the individual/group. Exceptions can imply deficiency (among other things) but I would argue that said deficiencies often are in how these groups are treated by society and not inherent to the groups or individuals themselves.
I'm going to use calculus as an example, since there are plenty of reasons you'd expect someone to not be able to do calculus. If you're sufficiently young, maybe you don't have the complex reasoning skills to understand calculus (deficiency, but not permanent). If you're an adult without a math education, would your inability to do calculus be considered a deficiency, or just a lack of opportunity which can be fixed through assistance? If you have been told your kind of person would suck at doing calculus but you really want to learn, and are performing worse than your peers who are told they are good at this naturally, is that a deficiency in the individual or the system they live in? If you have to work more than one job to keep your family housed and don't have time for calculus, if you are targeted for police violence, if you're discriminated against by even the most well-meaning people with authority over you, you could be the most brilliant mathematician and it wouldn't matter- society at large is failing you.
When you're talking about "exception" here, I think what is really happening is people taking measures to level the playing field for people who have experienced discrimination. In a perfect world with no individual or systemic discrimination, current or historical, these sorts of "exceptions" wouldn't be necessary! But that's not the world we live in. The first step to making a more equitable society is recognizing where people got shafted historically and what affect that still has on society today. Getting the short end of the historical stick does not imply immutable qualities about a group of people today.
So, no, I don't think that giving exceptions to people who need them most inherently implies that they are individually or categorically deficit.
Not sure what the distinction is, but, do consider trying this out next time you feel someone is getting frustrated! See if you get a better result. As someone who struggled with this, it can be very empowering to find the "right words" for a situation where you feel like you're doing poorly.
I'd say it's perfectly watchable and low in the bad takes department, at the result of kind of just stating the obvious (ceasefire now). A couple of things my leftist heart disagreed with, but generally in the "which solution is actually the most viable" sense and not the "we disagree about if 30,000+ people deserve to live" sense.
Safety tip, do not let anyone blow air up your vagina, even if they say they are God!! That's how you get a pulmonary embolism. Or immaculate conception.
I think it's also a smidge less likely in the sense that the data would have to be accessed/scraped from many different instances, as opposed to the sort of bulk data reddit seems to be selling. So I'd say protection from AI is much the same as lock protection. Someone can almost always pick the lock, but if you deter folks they'll look for easier targets. If you want to ensure none of your words are used by AI, post nothing.
This is a general frustration, so not at all about you specifically, but: we can't keep condemning a whole state for the actions of their shitty government, even in a "haha West Virginia is full of republican hicks" or "can someone saw Florida off the mainland like Bugs Bunny already" or "Texas can just secede if they want, I don't care".
Painting these entire states by the brush of their elected government lowers our empathy for the people there, and that includes the people who didn't vote for these gerrymandered fucks, children who are affected by these policies without their input, and people who can't leave even if they wanted to. Those are real people who deserve to have things like libraries and the chance to escape poverty.
When we oppose policy decisions like this, we can't leave behind people who agree with us but are in terrible circumstances that they have no control over. Statistically the people who are going to make the West Virginia state government any better are already living there, and we need to be in community with them rather than pushing them away.
You're thinking of Mpox, ie monkeypox