No, it's not "all or nothing." You people keep pretending that's what I'm arguing for because you don't want to acknowledge your own contribution to the problem. The person I was replying was trying to argue 'survival,' and now here you are moving the goalposts to 'wants.'
They keep conflating needs with wants, so whoever takes their wants away is immediately a bad person.
They don't need more money. As soon as they get more, they're going to spend more on more dumb shit while there are still starving children on the planet.
but that doesn’t really solve the bigger issue
It does if enough people do it.
we shouldn’t have to resort to that in the first place.
We need to stay far away from these restrictive platforms.
They don't care about their own rules. They will quietly ban anything that threatens their dominance, and if there isn't sufficient backlash then it will stay banned. (kind of like lemmy moderators)
The same thing happened to AdNauseam, an adblocker that blocks ads in addition to clicking them so advertisers get fucked over and website owners can still get paid. Google removed it years ago without justifiable reason, and because there was no significant pushback it stayed removed. It's what made me switch to Firefox. Seeing how chrome recently killed adblockers altogether, I'm glad I made the switch sooner rather than later.
What question?