gonzo0815 @ gonzo0815 @sh.itjust.works

Posts

6

Comments

182

Joined

2 yr. ago

I disagree. Smoked food is delicious.

Or food

How do I recognize them?

By the sound mine make I would have thought free jazz.

HODL lol

Did you reply to the wrong post?

Didn't that already happen?

Yeah that was some stupid shit, but coal was phased out at the same rate as nuclear in the last years. You also got to take into account that the decision to phase out nuclear was made before a critical mass (lol) of people realized that CO2 is a far bigger problem. I think the plants could be run some years more, but it takes more to flip a switch for that to work. We neither have personnel nor the supply chains anymore and building new plants will take decades, so it's far easier to just put all effort into renewables.

Yes because we have nothing else and never will.

A lot of suspicious "wholesome" posts on all, too. Seems like an astroterf to make the whole thing more digestible.

Weird, I thought we were living in a literal 1984 dictatorship. Did they forget to tell Putin?

It's really easy, just unplug your computer.

Oooh, I was confused by that lighter part, I guess it's supposed to be the tongue.

Wtf is wrong with the dads face in the last panel? My brain can't compute that.

I think the point is that people perceived your first post as a statement coming from a right wing conspiracy nut. With this post it's clear that you mean that there is a political bias in favour of the defendant.

Soo... you should eat it now, right?

Can't find the source right now, but some tweet compared it to peeing. Everybody has to pee, but when you have to go 30 times a day, there is obviously something different about you.

No it's not and it's also weird to treat that percentile as if people in it are extremely rare. People who fall in the blue area (noticably higher than average intelligence, but not exceptional) are about 15% of the population. The problem is that people somehow feel attacked if someone claims themself to be clever and it's accepted to shame them for that.

Two possibilities:

1. Apathy - people stop voting for parties that can be a counterweight to the far right.
2. Abbreviated analysis/Feelings over facts - people are more likely to fall for politicians presenting themselves as underdogs who are going to revolutionise the political landscape, which is a strategy fascists like to use. "Drain the swamp" is a perfect example for that, and if I remember correctly, there were a lot of potential Sanders supporters who voted for Trump. I know both are more or less opposites, but both provided a canvas for people's feelings that "politicians are all the same" and that fundamental change needs to happen. The latter is true, but with proper analysis shouldn't lead to voting for the far right.

The both-sides-narrative only helps the far-right.