You know what? That is actually some sound reasoning and I think that is an acceptable response.
I intended my original comment to be more a a shot at google than yourself, but I can see why you came back with what you said as a result, and then I got salty about it so I apologize.
Please go ahead and explain what the difference is between calling a person stupid and calling a persons ideas stupid, given stupidity refers to a persons intelligence by definition.
If you call someone's idea stupid, then by definition, you are calling them stupid by extension because that's what that word means.
If used in a colloquial manner I can understand how referring to someone's socks, or a device, or some inanimate object can allow one to call those things "stupid", but the fact of the matter is that referring to ones ideas as stupid is redundant to calling the person stupid directly because they both refer to the intelligence and original thoughts of a person and therefore literally mean the same thing by definition.
Furthermore, the notion that saying for example "Your shirt is stupid" or "Your idea is stupid" or "your feelings are stupid" instead of "You are stupid" is not ad hominem due to the colloquial usage is laughable as a fallacious argument only needs to attack the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person rather than attacking the substance of the argument to be considered ad hominem, and if a persons ideas are not considered an attribute of them, I don't know what is.
I think I'm pretty brushed up on how this works, but perhaps you should take your own advice, thanks.
Astounding, apparently you can counter the findings of this paper which proves beyond reasonable doubt that google is progressively getting worse when it comes to returning reliable and accurate search engine results.
I'm sure the scientific community would be really glad to see the evidence you have to the contrary, I'll even peer review your paper for you, let me know when you have a draft ready.
No, actually if you read my comment my idea is that they can use an AI release of the browser, while people who don't want AI in their browser can use a different release without it.
In response to "So your idea is that visually impaired people should just cry about not having alt text on a lot of images?".
This is a loaded question. You shaped the question to be this way so that it would contain presumption of my being guilty of not caring for the differently abled when I have never done such a thing.
My comment just suggests that options are good for consumers, in this case the option of being able to choose if you want AI in your software.
If you have a real argument against that idea that is not predicated on presumptive guilt regarding a topic different to what I was talking about like in your first response, feel free to let me know what it is.
To clarify for you, my saying "Users should have a choice of whether AI is in their browser" being met with your "Then you must hate blind people and want them to cry" does not follow and does not constitute an argument to the contrary.
Any browser which only offers an AI inclusive release, I won't use.
If any company that produces browsers really, truly, cared about their customer base, they would offer an AI release and a non-AI release.
Edit: It's unfortunate to see that we have reached a stage as consumers that even daring to suggest an option be provided results in such responses. Good luck to all of you when you decide you want an option when a business does something you don't like with a product because clearly you'll have no one interested in listening to you.
They are asking a question regarding something they do not understand.
It is a true statement that roads are used to transport goods and services.
They then simply ask who in the video is carrying goods and products into stores/homes, and how workers move goods from ports to the stores.
They don't know how a system like this works when it comes to, for example, stocking a grocery store, because they have not worked or lived in a place with infrastructure like this.
It's just ad hominem and poor practice to call someone blind when they aren't familiar with something, particularly when they seem interested in how it works, and works contrary to convincing people of the cause.
If someone has worked with punch cards to program a computer all their life, and someone showed them software written the python programming language and they said:
"But the punch card is so that the computer can read in bytes to know what to do, in this text I don't see any bytes, there's nothing telling the computer if this is little endian or big endian, it all looks like a book. How does the text tell the computer what to do?"
Then my response would NOT be "Well the list comprehension here is yielding a range of numbers which are sent to the print function, and this class is acting as a signal handler. Aside from punch card brained, you're also blind".
My response would be a very happy opportunity to explain to them the benefits of a modern programming language versus punch cards, and how it works in comparison.
Unless this is a person known to be explicitly anti-bike and pro-car, it is bad to be this critical of them and works in no one's favor.
You might also be interested in cron/crontab. You can schedule scripts/software to run at specific times of day, week, month, year etc.
Also if you want to learn more about the linux command line, three super useful commands for you are 'man', 'help' and 'apropos'.
man followed by a command, like 'man find' will show you the manual pages for the command 'find', showing you how to use it.
In some cases man wont work for some commands, in those cases try 'help theCommandThatDidntWorkWithMan'.
apropos followed by a query like 'apropos network' will show you any commands that have 'network' in their short description to help you find commands that you might want to use for something.
The source notes that for Mac there have been 2 exclusive games across all versions, and for Windows, there have been about 2560 across all versions. There doesn't appear to be a listing for Linux unfortunately.
It depends on how the source categorized the information and how Microsoft classifies the Xbox One versus the Xbox One Series (whether as being two actual different consoles, or two versions of the same console.)
There is only one entry for anything related to Xbox One as far as I can see so I expect the 12 it notes are distributed across all versions of the Xbox One, or that there are 0 dedicated games for the Xbox One Series proper.
By this logic every locksmith should be put on trial for making locks, every manufacturer of vaults and safes, every lumber company for making wood used in fences, every costume designer for making halloween masks, every post office for renting PO boxes... etc.
Wow, I didn't realize ActivityPub or Federated platforms went back that far. What platform/s were you on back then?