I find it difficult to understand that something should be banned because some people "don't need" to see it. Then don't look at it? And I'm talking specifically for war reporting now. I'm not talking for generic gore. It is war reporting. It is something that happens. By hiding it it only helps to enlarge our safe bubble and live in it. Sorry, this is not the world. If you want to live in your safe bubble it is up to you, but making it sound like the "correct way to handle reality" is wrong imo
yes. This is what I replied at. Having a version with ads and a version without ads is not that big of an issue. The issue becomes huge because the ads are personalized which means that they cannot even have a version with ads since the ads are different for each user.
the reason they are not doing it is because the ads are personalized. So if they want to bake an ad onto a video they will end up with countless videos each on with their own unique ads which is not viable logistically. So they can only do it on-the-fly. But re-encoding each video on-the-fly for each user is also a nightmare logistically, if not impossible at all.
it reached to the point that says "Pass complete, no errors, press Esc to exit" but the test still runs. So yes, I will re-do it for the additional passes, but from a first look, it looked fine.
btw, do you happen to remember whenabout the first crash happened? Did it start out sporadic and grow more frequent?
it started happening before one month. It could have such pattern, yes. In the beginning it started happening some of the times I was watching any video. In the end it ended up happening almost every time. Today I'm still trying to make it happen though but not yet.
mostly on youtube, usually at 720p30fps. I think if I go to 60fps it crashes even faster. Also I've tried watching on freetube and on firefox + mpv, but it can crash in all combinations
i will try it but I'm quite confident that it will be unresponsive/not reachable since if the kernel was listening it would respond to the alt + PrntScr + REISUB by unmounting the drives and I would see it when I examine the logs afterwards
isn't this a unified way to present logs that also exist in var/log ? I mean if the logs are saved in var/log I've checked them. If there is a possibility that journalctl has more entries, then I need to check this too.
sorry but what exactly do you mean by checking resource utilization? CPU? yes load increases but it is not indicative. It is not starting being laggy and eventually freeze. It goes from responsive instantly to non responsive. RAM? it is 8GB, it always shows as full including the cached items (which is normal), but it doesn't start to swap. Swap is ~1GB used. SSD? not full.
I find it difficult to understand that something should be banned because some people "don't need" to see it. Then don't look at it? And I'm talking specifically for war reporting now. I'm not talking for generic gore. It is war reporting. It is something that happens. By hiding it it only helps to enlarge our safe bubble and live in it. Sorry, this is not the world. If you want to live in your safe bubble it is up to you, but making it sound like the "correct way to handle reality" is wrong imo