gohixo9650 @ gohixo9650 @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

2

Comments

157

Joined

2 yr. ago

all religions are cancer. ALL. period. I can criticise any fanatic of any religion the same way I criticise the fanatics of the religion I grew up and was brainwashed to follow. I was able to leave. For some people it may be more difficult because of the situation in their country. However, the people who migrate in mostly atheistic west countries, they continue being fanatics by choice.

your addiction to analogies hasn't helped you a bit into at least making proper analogies

once I had a flatmate that every time he was cooking he was leaving the kitchen like a warzone and he had used every utensil available in the kitchen. He somehow thought that it was faster for him to focus only on the cooking and after it is completed, to do all the dishes, pots, utensils, glasses, oven trays, scissors, screwdrivers, hammers, drills or whatever else he may had used.

fingerprint login is not secure. period. Being stuck in using a password login is a plus

your memory might not works very well since it was never called plain "mozilla"

Less content, that is spread across multiple instances that can have duplicate communities.

on top of that, there redundant communities that are unnecessary even in the same instances. For example there is the android@ and the askandroid@. The first one has a decent amount of subscribers while the second one has a single digit number. I wanted to ask a question, I posted in the first one since it would make sense to reach more people. The post got deleted and I was told to go to the other one. In the first one they were posting only news articles.

This is ridiculous. Splitting communities in such way was the result of the huge traffic that such communities had in the past in other platforms. This makes sense only when the traffic is so huge that it is practically chaotic to navigate and moderate between news/articles and support questions. When both communities combined have 50 subscribers, such split only harms the platform and the users.

Everyone wanted to migrate by bringing an identical environment to what they had used to. However this should be adaptable to the current situation instead of directly copying it.

This!

the "I" in "AI" is not real intelligence either

Don’t fuckin buy it.

yes, this is what I'm doing. So, what is your point?

lol or "pay to win". Pay to have an AI reply for you that will guarantee to get the conversation going

yes, and how long until this be known? If the company self-sabotage itself so profoundly it will just be the end of the company. I'm not saying that their end goal is to survive forever, but this is incredibly shortsighted.

you didn't manage to reply to any of the arguments above. You just spitted out some basic principles which all of us are aware of. I don't understand even why you bothered to type these since they also don't offer anything valuable in the conversation

and what does it prevent them to do the same thing now? In both cases, sooner or later the real users will figure out they are bot accounts. I don't get how the company will benefit if they have a series of angry users when they realize that the messages were from bots all along? Or are they gonna keep the bar so high that the end users will never realize that they were bot accounts.

still not get it. You imply that these "premium messages" will be messages by AI bot accounts ?

app sponsored AI bots to lure people into paying premium

sorry but what do you mean? Can you please explain?

Attractive people simply don’t need the apps.

and funnily enough, attractive people are being "promoted" by the apps. By "promoted" I mean, that people who receive a lot of right-swipes are pushed higher in the stack of appearing to users because if users were seeing not-attractive users, they would ditch the app.

short answer: not possible without real moderation by people who are getting paid for that.

I’m genuinely baffled that you interpreted any of what I said as garnering sympathy for streaming platforms or their CEOs.

then explain me why you mentioned the "operating at a loss" thing. What does it prove in your argument? What does this offer in the dialog and please explain me if the CEO of a said company which is "operating at a loss" walks out with millions in their pockets or not. And also what will happen in the owner of a small business which is also operating at a loss. Then compare these two "operating at a loss" and tell me if they are even slightly comparable.

From their generic FAQ:

What is Disney+?

Disney+ is the streaming home for entertainment from Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic.

from my limited perspective, the word "plus" is to indicate the rest studios/companies that are included in the Disney (parent) company