Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GY
Posts
14
Comments
1,243
Joined
1 yr. ago

comparison

Jump
  • Holy fucking shit. I almost was exposed to a dirty word on the Internet by some asshole cunt. That bitch didn't know it's fucking illegal to say "pussy" on the Internet. Thank fucking god someone lazily and haphazardly covered a single letter from the word making it impossible for people to be exposed to such filth. I was about to shit a brick.

    fuck

  • I'm not sure how this comment is relevant to this conversation. My point is that this post is seeming minimizing the effort required to fight against the different causes of cortisol and may even make the situation worse.

  • Okay, sure. Still is a valid question, though.

    Also, that doesn't exactly provide concrete and evidence that he didn't use AI for this. Only that he has experience in writing without it and provides a character reference.

    Plus, he should be aware AI is a bad look and makes it seem like it's possible AI was used elsewhere, like in his writing, even if untrue. If you don't know about his credentials and history, like myself, then it's the simplest next step of logic that they could have used AI elsewhere and we can't know where without him stating where AI is used.

    Additionally, in that case, he should be understanding that using AI for his images helps further diminish a field that his own is similarly being diminished by the same tool and using that tool in that way legitimizes that type of use. Basically, if you make money off of what you're publishing, then just pay an artist. It's not difficult. Then you can easily avoid people reasonably questioning whether or not you used AI in the creation of the article.

  • Hard to trust any site that uses AI slop in their images.

    If they are willing to use AI images, why wouldn't they be willing to use AI in their writing or in how they interpret the data for their writing?

    This whole article could be based on logic or data that AI just hallucinated.

  • I've only ever heard people saying these kinds of posts make them feel worse, rather than being helpful.

    It makes it seem like "it's so simple, just be happy and the stress will go away" while they, obviously, already want that but it feels unattainable to them. Thus making them feel even more like there's something wrong with them because they can't achieve something that is portrayed as a simple thing.

    I get the intent of this post is in the right place, but in this case the execution is done poorly. It's best to leave this sort of thing to people more skilled and knowledgeable in the very important nuances of this kind of communication.

  • They really should be cooked, first.

    If raw, they would be much harder to bite into when compared to what a person would expect from a chocolate. Thus, it would be really easy to recognize something was off before you had sunk your teeth in enough to be fully committed. Meaning, a person could very likely just quickly spit it out before getting a good bite.

    If cooked, then the softness would make it so you're already all in and you'd get way more sprout all throughout your mouth. Even better would be to cook them so they are super-soft and would immediately become mush in the mouth.

  • Blue LEDs are great for when you need something blue in particular, but the color is piercing and way too bright. Then they are used as the default without any consideration for any other color.

    They are shitty in how they are used, rather than their individual abilities and functions.