goat @ goat @sh.itjust.works

incredibly autistic, sorry

---

Read more

Posts

152

Comments

517

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's a difficult situation considering some of the hospitals also house Hamas

Because at the time, while the Palestine Government operated in Gaza, they didn't actually hold power inside of Gaza. No, Hamas controlled Gaza and was in close contact with Arafat during the Accords.

My reading comprehension is just fine, thank you. Any other passive-aggressive remarks you want to make?

at least you're self-aware!

That is one of my sources, yes.

No, just pointing out the absurdity of bias on display.

Claims from organisations inside of Palestine are as reputable as those coming out from Israel.

if i was the IDF and I wanted to kill civilians without any witnesses, I'd use my largest and most destructive bomb to really make sure no one captures it on film.

but that's if I was evil.

Do you have any source better than the Guardian? They're not exactly reputable with ongoing conflicts.

Israel also publicly acknowledged they bombed an ambulance convoy, they claim the ambulances were used to transport Hamas militia.

The source is hamas themselves--Not very reputable, as reputable as the IDF saying they didn't do it.

According to the IDF, militias inside of Gaza are indeed using Ambulances and medical gear to disguise themselves. However, as previously mentioned--not very impartial.

So instead, here's footage showing a medic running to a downed militant, just to take the rifle to another militant while leaving the downed militant. Both militants are in civilian clothing.

While disputed, in 2014, Amnesty International claims that the hospital is being used as a Hamas base. It's worth noting that the Hospital itself was originally a military barracks.

reminds me of the conflict itself lol

Here are some destructive payloads of missiles and artillery

Unfortunately, I can't find the original source material, however I can link you to a video from a Rumble podcast showcasing the explosion I'm referencing. However, I did find this article, which contains much more gratuitous content, but is still on the topic of attacking refugees--The article notes that experts are unable to conclude what kind of blast it was.

Ministers were right though. It did end up with violence.

It helps to read between the quotes.

The only explosives in range would be missiles or artillery, which are much larger than the blast captured.

I'm fine with waiting for more reputable sources.

Do you have proof of this?

great job dude, you're really showing those rich fucks!

Are you referring to the video of the car en route to Egypt blowing up? If so, that wasn't Israel. The only explosives in range would be missiles or artillery, which are much larger than the blast captured.

The public currently doesn't know what caused the explosion. Some say it was fuel igniting, others say there was an IED either on the road or inside the car.

the fuck?

dude, they're attending remembrance services

It's a pretty good idea. But they're probably worried about terrorists squeezing through. Egypt's already had to halt some of the refugee routes because they caught a few terrorists sneaking through.

I care more about the factual part