Interesting, some of the variations might give valid results, but neither Meyers nor Briggs were qualified in any psychological capacity. As they presented it, and most often encountered today, it is an on/off system. I do like the spectrum idea and would like to see how that is implemented, as co-occuring traits are incompatible with the traditional MBTI results. I did find Kiersey to have some value (author of Please Understand Me), but I do find it odd that useful measures have been built on such a shaky foundation.
I'm not sure what place would be appropriate in a legal system for a personality test, though. MMPI could be useful, but not MBTI.
Something other than Briggs Meyers, as it's unreproducible bunk from non-experts. Not sure there's much in the way of accurate personality assessments outside of a clinical environment.
That's also a difference between blueberries and bilberries, which are often sold as blueberries. One of them is blue throughout, if I recall, but is more common on Europe vs. USA.
I can't read the letter on the block, so I don't know if the one on the right is an alligator or crocodile.