Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GL
Posts
0
Comments
42
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I found this one very dull, with the typical-of-the-genre problem that it felt like watching someone else play the boring parts of a video game. Then again, this isn't really my genre in the first place, so maybe its charm is just fully missed on me. A 2/5 premiere for me.

  • Normally I hate long premieres, but I think this absolutely would have benefited from a double-length episode; the pacing was solid, but the ending just felt very abrupt.

    So far the plot seems pretty generic, the twists are predictable, and our hero seems like a bit of an idiot (if you're not paid well and not good at hunting and it's not your dream or anything, why not just get a normal job where you probably won't die??). On the other hand, the animation was really good and I loved the fight scenes.

    Ultimately I give the premiere a 3/5. I'll give it another episode or two to get to its hook and see if I want to continue from there.

  • Went in without any real expectations and ended up really enjoying it. I just hope they manage to get around to saving the sister while it still makes sense for her to not be fully digested....

    i give the premiere a 4/5 and look forward to being hungry every week

  • The problem with calling these tools AI is not really an argument from definitions. The argument at its core is saying that the general public brings a lot of assumptions to something that's being called "AI", which aren't true but benefit investors.

    Like, all those stories of chatgpt citing fake studies and fake case law blew people's minds. If you know what chatgpt is (a fancy predictive text algorithm) these are pretty unsurprising events, but a lot of people had heard "AI" and applied their own associations onto its perceived capabilities, which was exactly the point of calling it "AI" instead of "LLM"