glibg10b @ glibg10b @lemmy.ml

Posts

9

Comments

457

Joined

2 yr. ago

The frontend has nine unresolved issues that were opened after the first 0.19 release candidate was released. Then there's the backend, which has about 15 more

they think it is ready

Haha, no.

I think your misunderstanding comes from the fact that "wouldn't work" can mean a lot of things, and you didn't know quite what it meant

If

1. you're not on an IPv6 network,
2. you enter the IPv6 address of a website into the address bar and
3. the browser attempts to load that website (not a search engine),

then the connection will time out:

OP never got to step 3, which indicates a problem with the browser

What does that have to do with anything?

It's only once you visit a website that it matters whether you're on an IPv6 network. OP isn't visiting the website at all; they're just typing the address and being taken to their search engine

That annoys the shit out of me

You have converted me

I hope you're donating to the respective libreddit instance hoster, because unlike Reddit, they're not a multibillion corporation with a steady ad income to pay for their traffic

If you're not, then I suggest you use old.reddit.com with uBlock Origin

But why use the app instead of the website with adblock?

Yet you still give them money by using their app

OP did not take this picture. Their story is made up. Here's the original: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/3/110

Looks like it's 6 x 2.25 V

That's the case for anything above 4 V, right?

I can't even find one in the modlog

Neat, thanks for sharing

Here's the above pseudocode in bash:

 bash

    
find /home/ -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d -exec mount none {}/.cache/ -t tmpfs -o size=16G \;

  

for doesn't work here because it uses spaces to delimit strings, which could cause issues with filenames that contain spaces

You can also create a systemd user service, which is useful if you don't have root access. The above mount command requires root, but the following doesn't and is more robust than symlinking to /tmp/:

 bash

    
ln -s $(mktemp -dp /var/tmp/) ~/.config/

  

You: It's a single user system
Also you: Tmpfs would have to be done for every user

And a /tmp/ symlink would have to be created for every user too, so I don't get your point

Tmpfs is just as easy as making a symlink, but without the filename conflicts between files in ~/.config/ and /tmp/. You just need to add a line to /etc/fstab

We have 15 months now?

This seems like a filename conflict waiting to happen. Why not just mount a tmpfs there?

/run/ contains such a directory

It's likely. mkdir fails to create a subdirectory such as ~/.cache/mozilla/ if ~/.cache/ doesn't exist, unless -p is explicitly passed to mkdir

Of course, not everything is a shell script, but I imagine the directory creation functions in many languages work similarly

https://xkcd.com/859