It would be a mighty shame if the interview broadcast experienced a distributed denial of service attack, wouldn't it? Thankfully for Putin, the west is above such chicanery and would never dream of screwing their opponents over like that.
Political expediency? Israel are the ones throwing Americans under the bus and not the other way around. It would be a golden beacon to the world that America still cares about human rights to defund Israel.
The answer to whatever question you're trying to ask is by not really arguing with them but by engaging in a way that makes their presentation worth less than the cost of their investment.
It's a variation of gish gallop. If you negate their point they'll just ignore you and hope nobody else engages with the correction. It's less spectacular and more secure from an infosec POV because with prime gish gallop the operator has to keep somewhere between many and dozens of premises oriented around the argument they're trying to push.
It would be a mighty shame if the interview broadcast experienced a distributed denial of service attack, wouldn't it? Thankfully for Putin, the west is above such chicanery and would never dream of screwing their opponents over like that.