geekwithsoul @ geekwithsoul @lemm.ee

I coalesce the vapors of human experience into a viable and meaningful comp

---

Read more

Posts

27

Comments

596

Joined

2 yr. ago

No, by all means, continue. You mentioned your "favorite socialist issues" and implied you would be around as long as they were. It would only be fair for you to expound on what those issues actually are.

You never actually discuss any issues, just your own imagined victimhood.

Funny words from someone with a proven history of trolling, lack of civility, and spamming according to the modlog. But please, enlighten us all about how you engage in good faith posting and commenting.

Sometimes the more you know about someone, the more you loathe them.

I'm sure there's an example I could provide, but I can't think of it right now ;)

A long-term advocate for environmental sustainability and social justice, Stein has struggled to gain mainstream recognition in a political landscape dominated by two major political parties.

Or maybe it's that she does jack for anyone in between pointless presidential runs and dinners with Putin? She has no real experience as an elected official, she has no impactful experience outside of politics - the only thing Jill Stein is experienced at is promoting (and fundraising for) Jill Stein. This pretty much goes for the other third party candidates as well.

Am I right in thinking this might screw with any autonomous vehicles that don't rely on LIDAR? (which I think is mainly Tesla at this point?)

So let's recap - in just the past couple of weeks you got a temp ban for trolling and then engaged in spamming replies because…

<checks notes>

You like to pretend you get the reaction you do because of your support for third-parties, but in reality it just seems you're getting back what you put out there. Perhaps if you engaged in good faith in anyway, you wouldn't receive the reaction you do? But that's the point, isn't? You have made yourself literally the worst possible voice for the ideals you pretend to hold. Much like the third party candidates you are so fond of propagandizing for.

Yeah, like the candidate you voted for: Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

And then when called out for it, you were proud of voting for someone who's supporting Palestinian genocide. Despite complaining about Harris "not doing enough". You're either a liar or a hypocrite.

BTW, you might want to be careful spamming more comments with copy/paste nonsense - you already had a bunch removed today for just that reason. Which I guess makes you a spammer, doesn't?

Better headline: Trump ground game undercut by unoptimized app that keeps crashing.

(Even with "fast" Internet, I can guarantee you if it's running into these problems in rural areas, it's still a piece of crap.)

Glad to know where the avowed socialist stands on killing civilians, including women and children, in Gaza and Lebanon. So brave of you.

EDIT: And evidently proud of it 👇

Right, because you voted for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

Monk would evidently much rather vote for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

No, they're voting for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

BTW, for that site and others with more of a nagwall rather than a paywall, viewing it in reader view takes care of the popup (and many Lemmy clients can be set to default to reader view for links)

There’s much better ways to do archive links that deal with paywalls, e.g. archive.is and others. News aggregators should not be relied on for archival links, as a link that works today may not work a year from now, as corporate agreements/ownership change

Obviously - can’t believe anyone would doubt them for a second

Actually I owe OP an apology - this isn’t the same site as the worst newspaper in India. This is a fake website supposedly run out of Korea:

At EconoTimes, we leverage the latest technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain, to enhance our operations and deliver news more efficiently and securely. By integrating AI, we streamline our editorial processes and deliver personalized content recommendations to our readers, ensuring they receive the most relevant and timely information. Our use of blockchain technology further enhances transparency and trust, allowing for verifiable and immutable records of our content, reinforcing our commitment to accuracy and integrity.

https://www.econotimes.com/about

More and more people

<Looks at vote counts>

What the hell is this source?! This ranks last in circulation in India (27th out of 27) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_India_by_circulation

Wow, OP has reached a new low - guess it’s harder now that they can’t just copy and paste links from a news aggregator without reading them. Now they’re probably just relying on search results and copying and pasting links without reading them

EDIT: see comment below - it’s actually worse than I thought

I agree. In terms of the .world mods and some of the specific cases you mentioned, I think at least part of the problem is that they are often looking at stuff at a per-comment or per-post basis and sometimes missing more holistic issues.

My guess is that a good portion of that comes down to the quality and breadth (or lack thereof) of the Lemmy built-in moderation tools. Combined with volunteer moderation and a presidential election year in the US, and I’m sure the moderation load is close to overwhelming and they don’t really have the tools they need to be more sophisticated or efficient about it. Generally I’ve actually been impressed with a lot of the work they do, though there have been obvious missteps too.

Everyone talks about Lemmy needing to grow in terms of users and activity, but without better moderation tools and likely some core framework changes, I think that would be a disaster. We have all the same complexities of some place like Reddit, but with the addition of different instances all with different rules, etc (not to mention different approaches to moderation).